Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 379

Is currency exposure an unwanted risk or source of returns?

Australia is a small, open economy which compels superannuation funds, fund managers and other large investors to look offshore for investment opportunities. In round terms, the market cap of the Australian Securities Exchange is $2 trillion and superannuation assets alone are almost $3 trillion.

Australians investing overseas

There are three main rationales for expanding investment horizons beyond domestic markets:

  • To uncover and exploit a much larger opportunity set to add to returns
  • To add diversification to the portfolio as a way of reducing risk
  • To move more ‘invisibly’ in offshore listed markets compared to the relatively small Australian market where large investors are liable to leave a ‘footprint’ and push market prices unfavourably as they place large trades into the market (the technical concept of investment strategy ‘capacity’).

Investing offshore, of course, brings a new portfolio dimension into play:  currency risk. Generally, any offshore asset in which an Australian investor invests is actually a bundle of two exposures – the risk/return of the asset itself, measured in the currency in which the asset is denominated (‘local currency’), and the value by which the investor’s ‘base currency’ (AUD) moves in relation to this local currency over the holding period – the currency exchange rate movement.

Here’s how this breaks down over the past decade for an investment in index-tracking (passive) international equities:

 

Developed & Emerging Markets
(MSCI All Countries World Index)

 

1 yr

5 yrs

10 yrs

Local currency

14.63%

10.11%

10.67%

Currency movement

(8.47%)

(0.83%)

1.29%

Base currency (AUD)

6.16%

9.28%

11.96%

Source: MSCI, Parametric. Reflects Accumulation Index returns (net), pre-tax, annualised over performance periods ended 31 August 2020. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Major impact of currency return

The ‘currency movement’ contribution to returns (capturing the difference between the portfolio’s local currency and actual AUD experience) are meaningful, especially over shorter time periods. Data informing investment decisions should always reflect the investor’s base currency – what is actually relevant to the investor.

To illustrate this, the comparable 1-year return for Developed Markets (only) equities was 14.39% in local currency terms, which lags the 14.63% All Countries return noted above, making it look like adding Emerging Markets was a good tactic. However, the AUD Developed Markets return was 6.39%, outperforming the AUD All Countries return of 6.16%

It shows in fact that expanding to Emerging Markets was a losing bet from an Australian perspective.

Of course, a sophisticated investor can currency-hedge the portfolio to reduce or remove the currency risk and isolate the particular exposure offered by the underlying assets (the ‘local currency’ performance). To currency-hedge, large superannuation funds typically use a series of ongoing trades in currency forwards (derivative contracts) whose pay-offs move in the opposite direction to the exchange rate movement of the underlying asset.

This does not quite mean that a fund fully currency-hedging its international equities over the last decade would have received 10.67%, though the fund’s AUD return should have been similar. Why? Because few currency hedges perfectly offset the underlying exposure and, even if they do, currency hedging comes at a cost.

For example, the Emerging Markets component of the above All Countries equities portfolio would have been difficult to currency-hedge in practice due to the limited liquidity in hedging instruments and regulatory restrictions on trading the currencies of some countries.

Particular attention needs to be paid to how to fund the ongoing rolling of the currency forwards (because these cashflows do not match the cashflows of the underlying hedged physical asset), and also to the tax implications of the hedge.

In other words, the currency hedge is of the pre-tax financial performance of the investment, not post-tax, nor does it hedge (offset) the actual cashflows required or generated under the hedging arrangement.

Currency as a source of return

Currency management is changing from ‘risk mitigation’ to currency as a potential return source. This promising new chapter in currency thinking marks an evolution which began in the early days of compulsory superannuation in Australia (the 1990s), when a typical balanced equities/fixed income global investment portfolio would have the growth assets (equities) unhedged and the defensive assets (fixed income) fully hedged. Effectively, currency exposure was treated like a growth asset, appropriate for fund members with a reasonable time horizon and risk appetite.

In the 2000s, the idea of a setting a static ‘hedging ratio’ for offshore equities came to the fore, like a targeted 50% hedged, 50% unhedged exposure. This ‘least regret’ approach meant that, given the volatility inherent in currency, a hedged/unhedged combination would not overwhelm the underlying equity performance (if the AUD rallied) nor overly damage the results (if the AUD deteriorated) over successive performance periods.

Today, this classic balanced portfolio is more likely to have about 28% of the equities and 61% of the fixed income currency-hedged (APRA quarterly superannuation statistics – June 2020).

The thesis that currency can be a return source is being pursued in programmes to dynamically adjust currency hedging ratios and ‘tilt’ to or from currency positions based on shorter-term views around whether the AUD (or any other currency) is over- or under-valued and how global macro-economic themes will impact the currency’s supply and demand.

Few of these sophisticated, dynamic currency management programmes have been around for long enough to build up a long-term track record. As they do, it will be fascinating to see whether currency, long seen as an unwelcome risk in global portfolios, can make a successful, remarkable transition to becoming a valued source of returns.

 

Raewyn Williams is Managing Director of Research at Parametric Australia, a US-based investment adviser. This material is for general information only and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Additional information is available at parametricportfolio.com.au.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Five principles from the lost decade of value investing

7 truths of volatility, but are they friends or foes?

10 big investment themes to watch in 2022

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 455 with weekend update

The resolve of many investors to focus on the long term with their share portfolios is increasingly tested as the list of negatives lengthens. There is a lack of visionary policies during an election campaign and stimulatory spending is contradicting the aims of tighter monetary policy.

  • 28 April 2022

Latest Updates

In praise of our unique democracy and its sausage

For all the shortcomings of our political campaigns, our election process is the best. We are blessed with honest administrators and procedures that we all trust to hand over power peacefully, with a big snag. 

Investment strategies

Is the investing landscape really different this time?

Many market analysts argue that the pandemic has changed everything but we must judge whether the circumstances are as drastic as billed. A quick review of four major events helps decide if this time is different.

Economy

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Retirement

When will I retire? Economic impact of an ageing population

About 39% of the labour force is aged over 45. Intergenerational reports highlight the challenges of an ageing population and the impacts on consumption patterns, dependencies, public finances and economic growth.

The real story behind the crypto crash

The recent sell-off in the crypto market and its trigger - the collapse of the Terra UST coin - has affected many institutions either holding or trading crypto assets, including crypto fund managers.

Investment strategies

Cash is the nightingale, the bird in the hand

The bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and it's an apt metaphor for investment choices. In 2021, as investors hunted in the bush for decent returns, demand overwhelmed supply. Cash is the bird in the hand.

Strategy

Book review of 'Putin’s People' and his motivation for war

Author Catherine Belton argues Putin’s sole ambition is to hold onto power. Her book seeks to understand why Putin invaded Ukraine after he became isolated and out of touch with reality during the pandemic.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.