Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 411

How long will the bad inflation news last?

Like other central banks, the US Federal Reserve has been complacent about inflation risks. The complacency was challenged by the 12 May announcement that the increase in the consumer price index was 4.2% in the year to April. Will US consumer inflation exceed 5% and, if so, when? And will the inflation increase prove temporary, persistent, or even permanent?

The next CPI release is on 10th June and will relate to May. In May 2020 the CPI fell by 0.1%. So an increase in May 2021 of 0.7% or more would take the annual rate to 5%. The average monthly increase in the CPI so far this year has been just above 0.6%, while business surveys indicate price-raising pressures are at their most intense for over a decade. Evidently, there is a possibility that the annual rate of consumer inflation will soon go above 5%.

As discussed in this video, the increases in the CPI were quite large in mid-2020, but then negligible (with an average monthly increase of half of 0.1%) in the last four months of the year. A good bet is that – if the annual rate does not exceed 5% next month – it will do so before the end of the year. (I discuss these developments in more detail in a recent article in The International Economy magazine).

In these e-mails the emphasis of the inflation discussion in 2020 and early 2021 was on asset price buoyancy and the remarkable surge in commodity prices from April 2020’s trough. But news is now emerging of big wage increases. McDonalds has raised pay by 10%, in order to recruit enough staff to deal with an anticipated boom in demand when lockdowns end. Meanwhile the Bank of America plans to add 25% to its minimum hourly wage between now and 2025. The labour market is tight. As the Covid-19 restrictions are relaxed and more people return to work, it will tighten further. Upward pressures on costs and prices will become even more general.

The Fed chair, Jay Powell, believes that it is his institution’s task to deliver ‘full employment’ and seems concerned that US employment is still several millions lower than in early 2020, ahead of the Covid-19 devastation. No one seems to have told him:

  • first, that the stability of the Great Moderation is often attributed to the argument that no long-run trade-off exists between unemployment and inflation, and,
  • second, that this argument leads to the prescription that central banks should concentrate on price stability.

Further, his research staff have evidently failed to explain to him that a monetary explanation of national income and the price level – in which inflation is determined mostly by the excess of money growth over the increase in real output – has a long and distinguished pedigree in macroeconomics.

Anyhow the answer to the question, “will the US inflation increase prove temporary, persistent or even permanent?”, depends on current and future rates of growth of the quantity of money, broadly defined. To recover the macroeconomic stability and negligible inflation of the 2010s, it is necessary for that rate of growth to be brought down to about 0.3% a month.

Two main difficulties need to be highlighted.

First, US banks are now keen to expand their profitable loan assets and to reduce the excessive ratio of unremunerative cash reserves to total assets. With M3 broad money at about $26,000 billion, increases in banks’ loan portfolios of $100-150 billion a month by themselves add about 0.5% to the quantity of money. (This assumes – perhaps wrongly in current circumstances – that banks finance the new loans by adding the same amount to their deposit liabilities. As just noted, they may reduce the ratio of cash to assets instead.)

Second, the Federal deficit is widely expected to reach $3,000 billion in the 2021 calendar year, or about $250 billion a month. Again, if that is financed to the extent of $100-150 billion a month from the banking system, the quantity of money rises by about 0.5%. On the face of it, US policymakers will not find it easy to restrain money growth to the low figures that are consistent with inflation of under 2%.

While the USA may have trouble over the next few years in dampening money growth and restoring low inflation/price stability, China is veering towards credit restriction. China has become far more authoritarian under Xi Jinping, while his Harvard-educated top economic adviser, Liu He, is reported to dislike excessive debt. In the three months to April, M3 went up by only 1.8% (or at an annualised growth rate of 7.6%). Annual money growth of little more than 5% would be the lowest since China’s opening to the world began after the death of Chairman Mao in 1976.

 

Professor Tim Congdon, CBE, is Chairman of the Institute of International Monetary Research at the University of Buckingham, England.

Professor Congdon is often regarded as the UK’s leading exponent of the quantity theory of money (or ‘monetarism’). He served as an adviser to the Conservative Government between 1992 and 1997 as a member of the Treasury Panel of Independent Forecasters. He has also authored many books and academic articles on monetarism.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

Buying resource and consumer staple stocks

Three reasons high inflation may trigger a European crisis

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.