Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 312

Network effects: when big gets very big very quickly

One of our primary investing fascinations at Lakehouse Capital is around networks. Think marketplaces, exchanges, payment networks, social networks, or any other form of business exhibiting network effects.

The big idea with network effects is that the product gets better with each additional node in the network. For example, being the first person you knew who had a telephone would not have been much good except for bragging rights, but the usefulness of having a phone exploded as they became fixtures in offices, homes, and then pockets. Or we could be talking about a two-sided network like PayPal: the more users who pay with PayPal, the greater the usefulness for the merchant, and the more merchants who accept PayPal the greater the utility for the user.

Network effects are not exactly a new concept and we’re hardly the first to appreciate their virtue and value. However, many Australian investors underestimate just how quickly value can be created by some businesses with a network effect at their core. Indeed, while seven of the world’s 10 most-valuable listed companies as of 31 March 2019 were powered by network effects, only one of the 10 most valuable listed companies in Australia is truly network-driven.

When networks get big fast

Many businesses powered by network effects can scale quickly and capital-efficiently, enabling a significant amount of value creation in short order. Remember the seven of the world’s 10 most-valuable listed companies are powered by networks? They’re an average age of only 27 years compared to the average age of 154 years for the non-networked giants. eBay reportedly was profitable from the first month it started charging for listings while Facebook was only 12-years-old when it first outearned the then-100-year-old Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

Why are networked businesses able to scale to such heights at such a speed? The rise of the internet, digital commerce and connected mobile devices has enabled a hyperscale that previously did not exist as new networks can reach larger audiences with greater efficiency than ever before.

Another reason that networks create value at rates that can sneak up on investors is that the lifetime value of each user added to the network increases as the network scales. For example, the value of the 2019 new user cohort at PayPal in per-user terms is likely far higher than it was just a few years ago because PayPal is now accepted by many more merchants, which enables new users the ability to transact in more places and increase their value.

Another surprise to investors is that networks are often able to scale with very high incremental margins thanks to relatively fixed overheads. The one-two punch of operating leverage and increasing incremental returns on investment is a powerful combination that can set such networks up for a long series of surprises relative to expectations. Again, PayPal, which is widely followed and presumably well understood, has beaten consensus expectations for normalised net income in 14 out of the 15 quarters since the company was spun off from eBay.

Scaling networks also have increasing optionality. For example, a network with a large and growing user base is well positioned to leverage its size and engagement to take new shots on goal. Prime examples include the likes of Tencent’s WeChat Pay, Apple Music, Uber Eats, third-party logistics at Amazon, and data packages from securities exchanges, among many others.

Such call options are hard to price and predict, but they can often prove lucrative in their own right with the added benefit of increasing engagement across the network. For that matter, networks that are leaders in their space, have attractive unit economics, and are growing users and usage at healthy rates find themselves getting ‘lucky’ by virtue of that strong position and significant user loyalty.

When networks are built to last

The above all sounds great, however, not all networks are created equally. Most fail to reach critical mass. Wikipedia lists 39 defunct social networking sites and that tally neglects the countless sites that failed to gain enough notoriety for their failure to be catalogued.

The ones that do reach a self-sustaining level are not necessarily huge winners either. You would have done incredibly well as an angel investor in Twitter, for example, but public market investors have fared poorly as the shares are down 7.5% over the past five years. Meanwhile, its chief rival, Facebook, has roughly 16 times as many daily active users across its platforms and a market capitalisation that is more than 19 times the size.

Why is Facebook’s larger set of networks more valuable on a per-user basis? To users, larger networks make for more connections, which make for greater utility and engagement. For advertisers, a larger audience delivers a wider range of inventory while a more engaged audience makes for sharper analytics and savvier ad targeting.

But wait. Couldn’t Facebook be the next MySpace? Maybe. Then again, MySpace reportedly only had around 76 million monthly active users at its cultural zenith, which is only about 1/31 the size of the core base of Facebook ‘blue’ monthly users. If anything, Facebook’s relative position is vastly understated on a user basis because of the network dynamics. Working off Metcalfe’s Law, the number of potential connections within Facebook today is something like 980 times that of the number available on MySpace at its peak. Little wonder then, for all the talk of deleting Facebook, its monthly active user base has increased by 8% over the past year.

We can’t know for sure when or how Facebook will be toppled, which is true of every other powerfully-networked business. Still, by seeking out leading, growing networks with attractive, improving unit economics, investors just might find themselves discovering a business that the market might be sorely underestimating.

 

Joe Magyer is the Chief Investment Officer of Lakehouse Capital, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691) and has been prepared without taking account of the reader’s financial situation.

Lakehouse Capital is a growth-focused, high-conviction boutique seeking long-term, asymmetric opportunities. Lakehouse is the investment manager of two strategies: the Lakehouse Small Companies Fund and the Lakehouse Global Growth Fund. Amazon, Facebook, PayPal, and Tencent are holdings of the Lakehouse Global Growth Fund. Joe owns shares of Amazon, Facebook, and PayPal.

For more articles and papers by Lakehouse Capital, please click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The connectivity revolution is only just beginning

Why it's a frothy market but not a bubble

FANMAG: Because FAANGs are so yesterday

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.