Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 256

Pilar Gomez-Bravo: How to select assets in a world of choices

Pilar Gomez-Bravo, CFA, is the Director of Fixed Income for Europe at MFS Investment Management. Pilar also has fixed income portfolio management responsibilities, having joined the firm in 2013. Prior to this, she was Managing Director at Imperial Capital and Head of Research and Portfolio Manager at Negentropy Capital within Matrix Asset Management. This discussion took place in Sydney on 15 May 2018.

GH: What’s the first thing you check in the markets when you wake up each morning?

PGB: I manage global multi-sector portfolios, so there’s a lot to cover. I check what interest rates have done overnight, what equity markets or equity futures are doing, movements in credit indices and key asset class relationships, plus the top news headlines. We construct portfolios from the top down but driven by bottom up research. We concentrate exposures on our high convictions, and we have to size exposures appropriately. We are running large issuer exposures and I check any developments that could impact them.

GH: When 10-year US Treasuries yielded 1% or less, how did you manage that and what do you think now is the argument for 10-year US Treasuries at 3%? Even with this higher rate, is there an investment case?

PGB: We have become a little immune to Quantitative Easing after 10 years of central bank intervention, but this level of liquidity injection was quite a shocking thing to do. It was an experiment and maybe there are not enough people around to remember what it was like to have central bank policy that didn't use such extraordinary measures.

The reason we had 1% rates in the US was because there were fears of deflation after the extremes of the global financial crisis, and uncertainty about how the financial system would recover. Australian banks didn't have the same degree of failure as elsewhere, but there was a lot of soul searching in markets that led to severe deflation fears in Europe and the US.

The central bank manipulation encouraged consumers and companies to spend money to recover from the shock. And that worked and now we are in a different period where we are seeing signs of inflation instead, but still not sufficiently high to worry people too much. There’s a little bit of wages growth pressure in the US but nothing that indicates a sudden different paradigm of inflation.

Demographics, technology and debt will limit inflation rises

And in the back of investors’ minds is the large structural headwinds against yields going higher such as demographics, the deflationary nature of technology and the amount of debt in the world. If they raise rates quickly, will consumers and companies be able to manage that increased debt load? There’s also heightened sensitivity in the G20 about currency wars. So we should continue a gradual progress to higher global yields but at a pace that should be able to generate a long-term total return from fixed income.

GH: As in the US, in Australia we've seen a movement in what we call MySuper towards lifecycle (or target date) funds. What do you think of lifecycle funds and the merits of putting more into bonds as people get older?

PGB: Well, 20 years ago I took the CFA and back then we were already talking about the appropriate level of risk for different age cohorts. There’s economic theory that says as people age, they have different risk return profiles. And it also shifts as people become spenders and stop earning. People are living longer and so the nature of the products they need should shift. On top of that, shocks like the financial crisis linger in the mentality of investors for a long time. Investors are reluctant to potentially lose all of their savings and they look to own some lower risk assets to protect capital by holding fixed income.

There is an increased variety of assets to invest in today than there were 20 or 30 years ago, so that gives more richness to the allocation decision for investors. For example, more ways to invest in real estate, a more targeted approach for individuals by using ETFs, or even shorting the market to take a negative view. All of that is relatively new which gives more ways to discuss the risk return profile.

Equity managers argue they can deliver income

A major development when yields went so low was that generically equity managers could go to clients and say they would be the providers of income and investors could forget about bonds. On this basis, the discussions from equity managers with company management led to dividend increases, and that's distorted the behaviour of companies around the world towards higher dividends, share buybacks and less investment. So perversely, central bank policy has led to lower levels of investment worldwide as companies have chosen to do share buybacks and dividends to appease their new shareholders with a promise of income. Hopefully, we’ll see a gradual shift back to investing in the company as policy normalises and global growth stabilises.

Finally, now we can go back to saying that with bond rates rising, especially in the front end in the US, we have an asset that gives a yield and that is good for investors looking for safe assets.

GH: Can we discuss the move to passive investing in a bond context. Would you support the view that for non-government bonds, the case for passive investing is probably the weakest of any asset class? Is there evidence that retail investors understand why it's a weak argument?

PGB: There are a couple of reasons why it's more dangerous to follow passive investing in credit markets. One is that benchmarks are dominated by companies where the more debt they have, the bigger weighting in the index. Two, liquidity matters in credit and you may not be able to get out when you want to. That leads to another discussion around ETFs and derivatives. Credit markets become illiquid in periods of stress.

And three, in credit markets you have an asymmetry of risk and return. You have no upside and you have all the downside. So paying attention to potential blow-ups becomes increasingly important as the economy reaches the end of the cycle. A keen awareness of risk-adjusted returns is needed because you don't recover from a credit default.

The role of active management

People have forgotten about the value of active management. First, yields are low at the moment so any fees paid are painful. Second, with low volatility and low dispersion, it's difficult to generate alpha without adding leverage or taking concentrated risk, but with an asymmetric asset class and increases in volatility, the value of active becomes apparent. We tell clients when looking at active asset managers, ask them to show their excess performance in different periods of volatility. Obviously, you want to see performance through the cycle, but you should expect higher excess returns in periods of heightened volatility.

GH: With your own portfolios, how much of the extra returns you generate comes from off-market transactions? For example, where a company wants $500 million quickly and they ring you up and offer say 100bp over the market.

PGB: Our strategies have two characteristics for portfolio construction: liquidity and diversification. We don't hold a lot of illiquid positions and for those exposures we need to be paid more because you lock yourself in. In the hunt for yield, there are three main ways to add yield. One is duration, which nobody wants. Two is credit risk, so we've seen huge inflows into credit and emerging markets. And third is illiquidity. There may be better opportunities at times of stress to consider more of these off-the-run illiquid positions.

GH: What do you think about the big spread contraction in the high yield corporate sector? Is there adequate reward for risk there now?

PGB: At the individual level in some cases, yes, but at the lower quality parts of the high-yield market (rated CCC), you are not getting paid enough for the traditional experience of losses. Despite the stresses seen in equity markets, the CCCs have outperformed. They have lower rate sensitivity, when the fear in the fixed income markets has been that the Fed might make a policy mistake. There’s also a lot of energy companies in there that have been supported by rising oil prices. In general, we believe that high yield as an asset class is expensive.

GH: It’s difficult to make statements about correlations between asset classes in advance of a stress event. We saw during the GFC correlations rose so that when you thought there was protection in your portfolio, it didn't help much. Can you give guidance on what you think about future correlations? Is there anywhere safe to hide?

PGB: You are always looking for uncorrelated returns and good sources of alpha in multi-sector portfolios. The first choice is between duration and spread and the right combination, and that decision depends on what paradigm you think you are living in. For a long time back to the 90s, the paradigm was ‘risk on, risk off’. But since the GFC, the new paradigm is 'Goldilocks/QE' and 'taper tantrum', where yields and credit perform in the same direction. I think as monetary policy normalises, we will revert to the ‘risk on, risk off’ relationships. It provides more of a diversifier against risky assets or spread assets. The reality is that in periods of stress, bank correlations move to 1.0, even though fundamentals have significantly improved since the GFC. When fear strikes in the markets, all banks underperform.

How to create a multi-asset portfolio

GH: What’s your high level process for creating a portfolio?

PGB: We are really mindful of risk management at every step of the investment process. First, decide how much risk you want to take, your risk budget. Then you have to do your allocation correctly. How many uncorrelated sources of alpha can you put in. Then you need portfolio construction where you match risk allocation with idea generation. What bonds do you actually want to buy that get you to that risk allocation? Finally, monitor the risks so that under any scenario, you don't get surprised by unwanted sources of risk. So that's still the basics.

GH: You probably know we had our Federal Budget recently. Conditions are better than expected with a possibility of moving into surplus next year. Now there’s a debate on whether we should spend more, tax less or repay debt. What's your view on governments repaying debt to give more security for the good times, especially for the US where trillions in debt don't seem to matter?

PGB: At a basic view, whether you are a corporate or a government, you need to be countercyclical in your finances. You need to build cushions in the good times for when the bad times come, so you can then spend the money and keep growing.

There’s too much debt in the world. The IMF forecasts that most countries will significantly reduce their debt-to-GDP ratios between 2018 and 2023, but the US will continue to increase. All the efforts of countries like Germany and Australia will be completely offset by the US as it’s such a huge part of global GDP. The US has fiscal stimulus at a time of almost full employment when that extra stimulus is not necessary. So when times get rough, how much more can be borrowed?


Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Cuffelinks. Pilar Gomez-Bravo, CFA is the Director of Fixed Income for Europe and Fixed Income Portfolio Manager at MFS Investment Management, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


Income investing during COVID-19 demands a dual technique

Does fixed income diversify portfolio risk?

Interest rate duration: how exposed are you?


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.