Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 318

Let’s stop calling them ‘bond proxies’

Imagine if you could nominate the one factor which has been most important in driving share markets to recent all-time highs. It would not only explain the past decade, but it could guide your future investing. So, what’s your suggestion?

Famous US fund manager, Howard Marks, has been publishing a quarterly memo to his clients for 30 years, and he’s seen it all in investment markets. In his latest memo, he answers this question without qualification:

“Low rates reduce the discount factor used in calculating the net present value of future cash flows. Thus, all else being equal, there’s a direct connection between declining interest rates and rising asset prices.

I consider this to have beenthedominant feature of the world of finance over the last ten years.

Low rates on savings and fixed-income investment drive investors to accept increased risk in order to pursue decent return in a low-return world.”

What if, in this search for yield, investors could have the best of most worlds: predictable income as offered by term deposits or bonds, high yields no longer available from fixed income, and the potential for some capital growth. Almost everything except a bond’s defined maturity value at a future date.

Welcome to the world of so-called ‘bond proxies’.

A ‘proxy’ can be ‘used to represent the value of something else’. Certain types of investments such as infrastructure and commercial property often have long-term monopoly locations with contractual payments from governments or large companies. Think airports, roads, ports, power stations, bridges, office blocks and distribution centres.

Are these three types of investment really alternatives to bonds or term deposits, or is bond proxy a misnomer? We’ll consider this in the context of listed securities, but hundreds of unlisted funds offer each asset class as well.

1. Listed infrastructure

Many companies listed on Australian exchanges offer revenue streams that have some bond-like characteristics. Sydney Airport (ASX:SYD) has a monopoly on air traffic into Australia’s largest city. It has exceptional pricing power, as anyone who has parked there or bought a coffee will know. It’s as much a shopping centre and a car park for captive consumers as it is a place where planes arrive and depart.

But it is not immune from equity-like risk. A global epidemic similar to SARS or an economic recession might reduce traveller numbers. Conflict between major super powers, or even war, could dramatically impact global travel. It’s conceivable that a cyber attack could hit the airport’s systems, or terrorist activity threaten the safety of flying.

Most of these risks relate to global travel, so what about Transurban (ASX:TCL), which owns many of Australia’s major toll roads? When the Eastern Distributor opened in Sydney in 1999, the toll for a car was $3.50. It’s now $7.69. What a great business, especially when the alternative is a painful traffic jam. But what about the future impact of driverless vehicles, or the dates when the concessions lapse and return to the government. One day, will we have flying vehicles which do not need roads?

Other infrastructure stocks include the APA Group (ASX:APA) which owns gas pipelines in every mainland state and territory, delivering half of the nation’s gas usage. Aurizon (ASX:AZJ) is a leading rail freight operator, transporting 250 million tonnes a year across a national network. These businesses are the essential plumbing of the Australian economy, and are considered defensive assets and less prone to economic downturns.

One way to reduce specific company risk to invest in an infrastructure fund listed on the ASX, and here are the choices:

  • Argo Global Listed Infrastructure Limited (ASX:ALI)
  • ETFS Global Core Infrastructure ETF (ASX:CORE)
  • AMP Capital Global Infrastructure Securities Fund (ASX:GLIN)
  • VanEck Vectors FTSE Global Infrastructure (Hedged) ETF (ASX:IFRA)
  • Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Currency Hedged) (ASX:MICH)
  • Vanguard Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ASX:VBLD)

These funds have different structures which may affect their appeal. Argo is a Listed Investment Company which means the shares can trade at a discount or premium to the value of their assets. This ‘open-ended’ form is at once an opportunity and a problem.

Both Magellan and AMP are actively managed, while the others replicate infrastructure indexes and offer lower fees.

2. Listed property

The more common name for listed property is Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts, or A-REITs, which are trusts which hold different types of property. The sector is currently offering a 4.5% dividend yield, and contractual rental arrangements make profit and dividend growth reasonably predictable at about 3 to 4% per annum. There are also property managers who operate the funds.

There are dozens of listed property investments, too numerous to list here, including smaller trusts in specialist segments. The leading names are Stockland (ASX:SGP), Scentre (ASX:SCG), GPT Group (ASX:GPT), Goodman (ASX:GMG), Charter Hall (ASX:CHC) and Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (ASX:URW).

During the GFC, many listed property trusts fell heavily in price because they carried high gearing and had ventured overseas into less-understood markets. Business methods are far better now, with lower gearing and a strong focus on Australia.

A crucial factor in A-REITs is the division into segments of office, retail, industrial and residential, and investors should consider the future merits of each as an investment. In 2018/2019, for example, the property fund managers, Charter Hall Group (up 72%) and Goodman Group (up 60%) both benefited from strong demand for the A-REITS they manage in growth segments such as commercial offices and industrial logistics. However, Unibail-Rodamco and Scentre fell 27% and 8% respectively due to concerns about exposure to the discretionary retail sector.

There are also property ETFs such as the Vanguard Australian Property Securities Index ETF (ASX:VAP), the SPDR S&P/ASX200 Listed Property Fund (ASX:SLF) and AMP Capital’s Global Property Securities Fund (ASX:RENT). A listed vehicle that combines both infrastructure and listed property is the BetaShares Legg Mason Real Income Fund (ASX:RINC) which holds A-REITs, gas, electricity, port and toll road listed asses in one fund.

3. Equity income funds

Many investors are turning to higher dividend yields to compensate for lower fixed income returns, but the move comes with obvious risks. Over the last 75 years, the Australian share market has experienced 40 falls of over 10%, so share investors must expect this level of correction regularly over all investment cycles. Worse, in 1974, 1987 and 2007, the market fell by over 50%, often with little warning or valuation excesses.

Every investor has a different appetite for risk, and just because a fund is called ‘equity income’ does not mean it is less likely to fall in value. It might have an income focus, but it is still an equity fund.

Despite the experience in a stock like AMP (ASX:AMP) which has suspended its dividends, or Telstra (ASX:TLS) which has reduced its dividends, most companies sustain their dividends during a market sell off. Dividends are more resilient than share prices, and equity income funds certainly produce higher income as some compensation for the added risk. An equity income fund in the current market can produce a dividend yield of around 6% or 8% grossed up for franking credits.

Equity income funds concentrate their investments in the large dividend-paying stocks of banks, Telstra, Wesfarmers and more recently, BHP. It is a stretch to call these investments ‘bond proxies’, as banks are leveraged companies exposed to economic cycles, and resource companies are subject to volatile commodity prices. Investors should consider the total return, including capital gains and losses, not only income. Nevertheless, 8% fully-franked is difficult to resist for at least part of a portfolio.

Examples of listed equity income Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are:

  • Australian Dividend Harvester Fund (ASX:HVST)
  • Vanguard Australian Share High Yield Fund (ASX:VHY)
  • iShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ETF (ASX:IHD)
  • SPDR MSCI Australia Select High Dividend Yield Fund (ASX:SYI)
  • BetaShares Legg Mason Equity Income Fund (ASX:EINC)
  • Equity Yield Maximiser Fund (ASX:YMAX)

Other variations include a fund specifically investing in Australian banks, the VanEck Vectors Australian Banks ETF (ASX:MVB), global income funds such as the S&P500 Yield Maximiser (ASX:UMAX) and actively-managed Listed Investment Companies like Plato Income Maximiser Limited (ASX:PL8).

Don’t be tricked by the ‘bond proxy’ label

As with share investments, however, they are subject to overvaluation when investors chase predictable revenue, and their share prices will fall in a major market correction. They may reduce dividends or suffer adverse market reaction if interest rates rise.

The macro environment of central banks injecting liquidity and pushing down interest rates has been a perfect environment for so-called bond proxies, but the threat of trade and currency wars and slowing economic growth might push bond proxies more into the equity proxies camp.

The reality is that although cash flows may be long term and more predictable than some companies, the shares listed above lack a crucial characteristic of a bond: the contractual obligation of the issuer to repay principal at maturity. Regardless of what happens to interest rates, a bond with a maturity value of 100 will pay 100 except where the issuer faces financial difficulty or default (in the universe of investment grade bonds rated AAA, AA, A and BBB, the average default rate is around 2.5%). Although bonds can suffer a fall in value during their term as rates rise, so too will bond proxies which benefitted from the rate fall. During tough market conditions, bonds are likely to outperform, and bond proxies do not carry the same defensive characteristics as term deposits.

Investors should resist the urge to attach the bond proxy label on infrastructure, property and equity income, but accept them for what they are. They have a legitimate role in a portfolio as income-producing, quality assets that will be subject to market forces with no guarantee of a return of capital at some future maturity date.


Graham Hand is Managing Editor of the Cuffelinks Newsletter. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.


August 10, 2019

Good reading Graham.

Readers will remember during the GFC AREITS which invested in US properties (financed by expensive US debt) were deservedly taken to the cleaners. The doors for refinancing were firmly closed when time came to refinance … and assets had to be sold in weak markets.

But more recently critics of so-called bond proxies do not acknowledge that in the present cycle of low interest rates, the debt-heavy utilities and AREITS are refinancing maturing (and relatively expensive ) debt in lower cost debt.

Tony Dillon
August 09, 2019

A “bond proxy” it may not be, but equity income stacks up quite well in this low interest rate environment.

For example, the yield on ten year government bonds is now less than 1%. Consider the 3.25% Treasury Bond maturing in April 2029. It closed this week at a price of 122.9 on a yield of just 0.89%. With face value of 100 paid at maturity, if purchased now at 122.9, a capital loss of 18.6% is locked in, compensated by the fixed annual 3.25% coupon being well in excess of current market yields.

Now consider equity income, say a bank stock, on a dividend yield of 6% before franking. Say one invests 122.9 now in the stock. With annual dividends of 7.4, assume the stock is held to April 2029 and sold at that time. Then a yield of 0.89% would imply a capital loss of 53.5%. That is, the stock is sold at 57.1.

So the stock would have to more than halve in value to realise the same yield as the bond over the same period.

The chance therefore that the stock outperforms the bond in terms of yield would appear to be high. And with a dividend yield six times more than the yield on the bond, why wouldn’t it.

mike faler
August 06, 2020

Exactly! Plus could one consider a ratio of bond and stock ownership of the same company, as equal... e.g. 5:1, 4:1. And what about ETF's like XLE @ 5.1% and XLU @ 3.2% (ETFs of the energy and utilities sector listed in the US). Their 'odds of default' are much less than a single company. 

John Nichols
August 09, 2019

Default definition can be mere missing a coupon payment. Investment grade losses of capital are rare

August 08, 2019

Bond proxy should be ok if people take note of the word “proxy” and that this is referring to bonds generally not Gov bonds or term deposits. Many bonds also do not guarantee a capital return there is always credit risk.

Graham Hand
August 12, 2019

Thanks, Adrian, yes, closed-ended is correct. We’ve changed it and put in an short explanation.

August 08, 2019

Many fund managers jumped aboard the ‘equity income’ label as if that someone made their funds less risky than other equity funds. Selecting stocks based on their income and not share price potential is not an ideal way to run a share portfolio. More a constraint.

SMSF Trustee
August 12, 2019

Frank that’s NOT how most equity income managers do things. I use them in my fund and they deliver exactly what they promise – a return that is a bit less than shares over time, but with a lot less volatility than shares and a higher income to growth ratio than a share fund. They do this through their use of options strategies and not based on dividend yields. They aren’t as stupid as you seem to think they are.


Leave a Comment:



Focus on quality yield, not near-term income

Why August company reporting season was poor

A-REITs outperform but will it continue?


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Australia’s bounty: is it just diversified luck?

Increases in commodity prices have fuelled global inflation while benefiting commodities exporters like Australia. Oftentimes, booms lead to busts and investors need to get the timing right on pricing cycles to be successful.

Meg on SMSFs – More on future-proofing your fund

Single-member SMSFs face challenges where the eventual beneficiaries (or support team in the event of incapacity) will be the member’s adult children. Even worse, what happens if one or more of the children live overseas?

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Five features of a fair performance fee, including a holiday

Most investors pay little attention to the performance fee on their fund but it can have a material impact on returns, especially if the structure is unfair. Check for these features and a coming fee holiday.


Ned Bell on why there’s a generational step change underway

During market dislocation events, investors react irrationally and it should be a great environment for active management. The last few years have been an easy ride on tech stocks but it's now all about quality.  

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Powers of attorney for your fund

Granting an enduring power of attorney is an important decision for the trustees of an SMSF. There are alternatives and protections to consider including who should perform this vital role and when.


The great divergence: the evolution of the 'magnetic' workplace

The pandemic profoundly impacted the way we use real estate but in a post-pandemic environment, tenant preferences and behaviours are now providing more certainty to the outlook of our major real estate sectors.


Bank reporting season scorecard May 2022

A key feature of the May results for the banking sector was profits trending back to pre-Covid-19 levels, thanks to lower than expected unemployment and the growth in house prices.

Why gender diversity matters for investors

Companies with a boys’ club approach to leadership are a red flag for investors. On the other hand, companies that walk the talk on women in leadership roles perform better, potentially making them better investments. 


Is it all falling apart for central banks?

Central banks are unable to ignore the inflation in front of them, but underlying macro-economic conditions indicate that inflation may be transitory and the consequences of monetary tightening dangerous.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.