Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 631

The quiet winners of AI competition

Nvidia closed out the earnings season for big tech with a bang. Revenues grew 56% from a year ago, and net profit by 59%. Those are phenomenal results for a company of any size, let alone the world’s first $4 trillion business. Yet the shares are down since then. When expectations are high, even great results aren’t good enough to produce a positive surprise and drive prices higher. The flip side of that is more worrying: when expectations are high, so is risk.

Many of the technology giants are in a similar boat. Expectations are high, but competitive intensity and capital intensity are heating up. What were once monopolies are now fierce competitors. What were once capital-light businesses are now investing more capital than all the oil majors combined. As intensity rises, profitability usually falls.

Meta is an instructive case in capital intensity. Since the end of 2019, net income has grown by about 25% per annum, but so have capital investment and share-based compensation. Stripping out share-based compensation, Meta’s growth in free cash flow has been zero since 2019. The company is now depreciating AI servers over five years, yet those servers are stuffed with chips that lose their edge in a single year. When depreciation schedules become interesting, you’re talking about a capital-intensive business.

But competition is the scarier of the two intensities. Nvidia faces aspiring competition from AMD, Broadcom, and custom chip designs from its tech giant customers. The giants are in a money-throwing contest to win in offering AI services. OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, and others are likewise in a money-throwing contest to win in building AI models. All while some of their competitors, including upstarts like DeepSeek, give their models away. Each company believes the battle will be winner-take-most, and each worries that the threat to their golden goose could be existential. Under the circumstances, AI competitors will find it very difficult to stop spending on chips.

This makes Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) a compelling way to participate in AI adoption. The company makes all of Nvidia’s leading-edge chips, as well as all the leading-edge chips for Nvidia’s competitors and Apple. No matter who wins in AI chip design, TSMC wins. No matter who wins in AI services, TSMC wins. No matter who wins in AI model building, TSMC wins. In our view, TSMC is the only big tech company that deserves to trade at a monopoly multiple. Yet it trades at less than 20 times forward earnings, while Nvidia trades at 40 times. The market undervalues TSMC because Taiwan is in the name, but what happens to Nvidia or Apple if something bad happens to TSMC? Risks to TSMC are also risks to its customers.

TSMC is not alone among chip manufacturers. AI chips run zillions of similar calculations all at once, and to do that well, the processor needs vast amounts of data available instantly. Think of trying to hold thousands of phone numbers in your head at once. As a result, AI chips are much more memory intensive than conventional chips. A single Nvidia Blackwell processor has more gigabytes of short-term memory on the chip than most iPhones have in total storage.

That on-chip memory is also more specialised than traditional memory. To simplify a little, imagine some playing cards (the memory) and a book (the processor) on a table. They used to sit side-by-side, communicating only through the edges. The cards are now stacked 8- or 12-high on top of the book, allowing more surface area for faster communication. For memory makers, this high-bandwidth memory (HBM) is more profitable and less commoditised than their traditional products.

That bodes well for the HBM leader, Korean memory maker SK Hynix, which is seeing rapid growth yet trades at less than 10 times earnings. A fifth of SK Hynix is owned by SK Square, and that stake accounts for most of Square’s value. Though holding company discounts are not always quick to close, Square effectively lets us access Hynix at a lower price. American manufacturer Micron Technology is just behind Hynix in HBM, and is seeing similar fundamental improvement. But the real beauty for the memory makers can be seen in the laggard, Samsung Electronics. Historically the leader in memory, Samsung has fallen behind in selling HBM chips to Nvidia. That hardly spells doom for its fundamentals, however, because HBM takes manufacturing capacity away from traditional memory. Less capacity leads to a tighter supply-demand balance and better pricing for those chips. Spot prices for 16GB of memory are up by more than 50% over the past two years.

Memory remains a capital-intensive business, and competitive intensity in the industry used to be brutal. Yet the difficulty of keeping up with new manufacturing technology has winnowed the field from a dozen makers to three, allowing for a more rational competitive environment.

AI adoption will create growth opportunities for many companies. Investors have great expectations for today’s leaders in AI chip design, AI services, and AI models, even as those companies see rising competitive and capital intensity. With the chip manufacturers, we believe we’ve found an appealing combination of lower expectations and lower competitive intensity. In a money-throwing contest, the winners are the catchers, not the throwers.

 

Eric Marais is an Investment Specialist at Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information at a point in time and not personal financial or investment advice. It should not be used as a guide to invest or trade and does not take into account the specific investment objectives or financial situation of any particular person. The Orbis Funds may take a different view depending on facts and circumstances.

For more articles and papers from Orbis, please click here.

 

  •   1 October 2025
  • 1
  •      
  •   
1 Comments
 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

AI is not an over-hyped fad – but a killer app might be years away

Should you buy and hold an Artificial Intelligence portfolio?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Latest Updates

Shares

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Superannuation

When you can withdraw your super

You can’t freely withdraw your super before 65. You need to meet certain legal conditions tied to your age, whether you’ve retired, or if you're using a transition to retirement option. 

Retirement

A national guide to concession entitlements

Navigating retirement concessions is unnecessarily complex. This outlines a new project to help older Australians find what they’re entitled to - quickly, clearly, and with less stress. 

Property

The psychology of REIT investing

Market shocks and rallies test every investor’s resolve. This explores practical strategies to stay grounded - resisting panic in downturns and FOMO in booms - while focusing on long-term returns. 

Fixed interest

Bonds are copping a bad rap

Bonds have had a tough few years and many investors are turning to other assets to diversify their portfolios. However, bonds can still play a valuable role as a source of income and risk mitigation.

Strategy

Is it time to fire the consultants?

The NSW government is cutting the use of consultants. Universities have also been criticized for relying on consultants as cover for restructuring plans. But are consultants really the problem they're made out to be?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.