Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 51

The US recovery will surprise on the upside

Many commentators suggest that US economic growth will remain subdued. However, a number of indicators are suggesting it will surprise on the upside. If it does, there will be significant implications for policy, investment markets and portfolio construction.

In our opinion, a wide range of indicators point to a likely acceleration of US economic growth in 2014:

  • Improvement in the US labour market is real – Jobs are being created at a rate of 2.1 million p.a., the unemployment rate has fallen to 6.6% and average weekly earnings are rising. Although some economists believe that declining labour force participation indicates that unemployment is worse than headline figures suggest, it is important to note that participation has been naturally declining since 2000 as a result of the ageing of the US population, not just since the financial crisis.
  • Housing will help drive the economy - Recoveries in key indicators such as home prices, housing starts and mortgage debt are encouraging. We believe that private residential fixed investment remains depressed at around 1.5% of GDP, below its long run level (excluding multiplier effects) and will inevitably revert to more normal levels. Furthermore, the share of residential mortgages in negative equity has fallen considerably over the past couple of years which may encourage more households to draw down on home equity for consumption.
  • Credit conditions are favourable – Household debt has fallen considerably from its peak of 96% of GDP in 2009 to 77% today (the same as 2003), providing scope for rising consumption in the future. Furthermore, US banks are well positioned to deliver credit growth with common tangible equity to common tangible asset ratios having approximately doubled since 2008.
  • The competitive position of the US is improving – US manufacturing hourly labour costs have fallen significantly relative to other countries (in USD terms) over the past 10 years. The shale boom has also provided the US with a massive energy cost advantage, while also helping to reduce the trade deficit.
  • Fiscal drag is decreasing - The government expenditure component of GDP has been contracting in recent years following the large stimulus provided during the financial crisis. Economists estimate that expenditure cuts and payroll tax increases reduced GDP growth by 1.5-2.0% in 2013. However, a dramatic recovery in the federal budget deficit suggests there is declining pressure for further cuts, and the fiscal headwind is expected to be just 0.5% in 2014.

It is our view that, in the absence of a material negative shock, the US economy will experience accelerating economic growth over the next 12 to 24 months, and is likely to surprise on the upside.

What does a US upside surprise mean for markets?

A strengthening US economy will require the Federal Reserve to reduce the unprecedented monetary policy support it has provided since the global financial crisis in order to ward off excessive risk-taking in the financial system and to protect against future inflation. The Fed’s exit from QE poses risks for equity and other asset markets (particularly currency and bond/credit markets) as long term interest rates start to move closer to pre-crisis levels, potentially causing a dramatic redistribution of global money flows. We continue to view the Federal Reserve’s exit from QE as the major current investment risk.

A faster-than-expected US economic recovery, with strong demand for credit, could lead to high inflation as banks start to lend from their massive pool of excess reserves, currently USD2.4 trillion. While the Fed has a number of tools that could reduce the size of excess reserves or neutralise their impact, there is no reliable historical precedent that can guide investors (or the Fed itself) as to what will happen to markets as QE unwinds.

We continue to believe that there are two main scenarios that could play out:

  • An orderly unwinding of QE. This is our base case, predicated on a steady but not sharp US recovery, with a gradual increase in credit demand, and contained rises in short and longer term US yields. Under this scenario we would expect the US 10 year Treasury yield to rise to around 4.5-5.5% over the next one-and-a-half to two-and-a-half years. We would expect elevated market volatility and potentially some dramatic re-pricing of certain asset classes. This scenario does not overly concern us from an investment perspective.
  • A disorderly unwinding of QE. Under this scenario, longer dated bond yields could start increasing rapidly as investors lose confidence in the Fed’s ability to exit QE in an orderly manner (it is not unthinkable that US 10-Year Treasury yields could hit 8-10% over the next one-and-a-half to two-and-a-half years). This could lead to massive market dislocations, including large and rapid falls in asset prices, major moves in currency markets and the withdrawal of liquidity from certain emerging markets, as well as increase global systemic risk. A rapid rise in longer term US interest rates would also be highly likely to drive up longer term interest rates around the world, potentially re-igniting the European sovereign debt crisis.

We assess the risk of a disorderly unwinding of QE to be a ‘fat tail’, or low-probability, scenario. However, as we have repeated on many occasions, low probability does not mean zero probability.

Implications for portfolio construction

Although a rise in US economic growth presents a tailwind for businesses positively exposed to the US economy, it is important to recognise that economic growth is not the most important determinant of equity market returns. Indeed, we believe long term interest rates have historically been more important to aggregate stock market performance; higher interest rates will reduce valuations via the discount rate on companies’ expected future cash flows, leading to lower equity price-earnings multiples in aggregate. Investors should be asking themselves ‘what effect will higher interest rates have on markets?’ We are paying close attention to this critical question.

 

Hamish Douglass is CEO and Portfolio Manager at Magellan Asset Management. This material has been prepared by Magellan Asset Management Limited for general information purposes only and must not be construed as investment advice. It does not take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.

 

  •   28 February 2014
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Trump’s fiscal stimulus threatens stocks

Stock market winners 10 years on

Why China’s property market matters

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australia's retirement system works brilliantly for some - but not all

The superannuation system has succeeded brilliantly at what it was designed to do: accumulate wealth during working lives. The next challenge is meeting members’ diverse needs in retirement. 

Australian stocks will crush housing over the next decade, 2025 edition

Two years ago, I wrote an article suggesting that the odds favoured ASX shares easily outperforming residential property over the next decade. Here’s an update on where things stand today.

Get set for a bumpy 2026

At this time last year, I forecast that 2025 would likely be a positive year given strong economic prospects and disinflation. The outlook for this year is less clear cut and here is what investors should do.

The 3 biggest residential property myths

I am a professional real estate investor who hears a lot of opinions rather than facts from so-called experts on the topic of property. Here are the largest myths when it comes to Australia’s biggest asset class.

AFIC on the speculative ASX boom, opportunities, and LIC discounts

In an interview with Firstlinks, CEO Mark Freeman discusses how speculative ASX stocks have crushed blue chips this year, companies he likes now, and why he’s confident AFIC’s NTA discount will close.

Property versus shares - a practical guide for investors

I’ve been comparing property and shares for decades and while both have their place, the differences are stark. When tax, costs, and liquidity are weighed, property looks less compelling than its reputation suggests.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Meg on SMSFs: First glimpse of revised Division 296 tax

Treasury has released draft legislation for a new version of the controversial $3 million super tax. It's a significant improvement on the original proposal but there are some stings in the tail.

Investment strategies

10 fearless forecasts for 2026

The predictions include dividends will outstrip growth as a source of Australian equity returns, US market performance will be underwhelming, while US government bonds will beat gold.

Infrastructure

How many hospitals will an extra 1 million people need?

We're about to add another million people to cities like Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne. How many hospitals and other essential infrastructure are needed to cater to a million more people? This breaks down the numbers.

Risk management

Is the world's safest currency actually the riskiest?

The US dollar’s long-standing role as a ‘shock absorber’ during times of market stress is showing cracks. The ‘Liberation Day’ sell-off was a timely reminder of this, and here's what investors should do about it.

10 things I learned about dementia and care homes from close range

My mother developed dementia before eventually dying in June last year. She was in three aged care homes before finding the right one. Here is what I learned along the way.

Economics

China's EV and solar backlog and future trade wars

China has flooded the world with electric cars and solar panels to offset the economic drag from a weak domestic property market. How long can this go on, and what are the implications for commodities and Australia?

Investment strategies

Why Elon Musk's pay packet is justified

Tesla copped criticism after its shareholders approved a package allowing Musk to earn up to $1 trillion in stock options. If only Australian businesses were more like Tesla.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.