Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 622

Investing at market peaks: The surprising truth

After crashing hard in April, the US stock market rebounded even harder, recently hitting a new all-time high. This has left many investors feeling nervous about the potential for a fall.

Many others have parked savings in cash, attracted by the high rates on offer. The thought of investing that cash-on-the-sidelines when the stock market is at an all-time high feels uncomfortable. But should it?

The conclusion from our analysis of stock market returns since 1926 is unequivocal: no.

The market is actually at an all-time high more often than you might think. Of the 1,187 months since January 1926, the market was at an all-time high in 363 of them, 31% of the time.

And, on average, 12-month returns following an all-time high being hit have been better than at other times: 10.4% ahead of inflation compared with 8.8% when the market wasn’t at a high. Returns on a two or three-year horizon have been similar regardless of whether the market was at an all-time high or not (see chart below).

Figure 1: Returns have been higher if you invested when the stock market was at an all-time high than when it wasn’t
Average inflation-adjusted returns for US large cap equities, p.a.

Differences compound over time

$100 invested in the US stock market in January 1926 would be worth $103,294 at the end of 2024 in inflation-adjusted terms, growth of 7.3% a year. In contrast, a strategy which switched out of the market and into cash for the next month whenever the market hit an all-time high (and went back in again whenever it wasn’t at one) would only be worth $9,922 (Figure 2). This is 90% lower! The return on this portfolio would have been 4.8% in inflation-adjusted terms. Over long time horizons, differences in returns can seriously add up.

Figure 2: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

This analysis covers a nearly 100-year time horizon, longer than most people plan for. But, even over shorter horizons, investors would have missed out on a lot of potential wealth if they had taken fright whenever the market was riding high (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Selling stocks whenever the market was at an all-time high would have destroyed 90% of your wealth in the very long-run
Growth of $100, inflation-adjusted terms

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and may not be repeated.
Data January 1926-December 2024. Y-axis is a logarithmic scale. Switching strategy moves into cash for the next month whenever the previous month-end was an all-time high, and is invested in stocks whenever it wasn’t. Results exclude transaction costs. Stocks represented by Ibbotson® SBBI® US Large-Cap Stocks, Cash by Ibbotson® US (30-day) Treasury Bills. Source: Morningstar Direct, accessed via CFA Institute and Schroders.

Conclusion? Don’t fret over all-time highs

It is normal to feel nervous about investing when the stock market is at an all-time high, but history suggests that giving in to that feeling would have been very damaging for your wealth. There may be valid reasons for you to dislike stocks. But the market being at an all-time high should not be one of them.

 

Duncan Lamont, CFA is Head of Strategic Research at Schroder Investment Management Australia. This material is general information only and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Schroders does not give any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information which is contained in this material. Read the full report and important disclaimers here.

For more articles and papers from Schroders, click here.

 

11 Comments
Mark
August 04, 2025

I would really be interested if the same applies to the Australian market given that we haven't run so hard after the last few years. Is there some analysis on this?

James Gruber
August 04, 2025

Hi Mark,

I'd love to have the data but don't.

I will pass it on to a few of our quant-focused sponsors and see if they would like to do it.

James

allan
August 04, 2025

What I miss in all this analysis is the retiree who is drawing down from these assets at both highs and lows of the market. This analysis is based on leaving the funds untouched for long periods of time.

Harry
August 05, 2025

Should’ve started investing when you got your first job pumping gas at the local Esso station!

Jeremy Campbell
August 01, 2025

Rubbish. The old old lies damn lies and statistics approach. Not so funny how these articles appear at market highs as the bubble blowers seek to pull in the last of the dumb money while cashing out themselves. My view (which is worthless) is that the market will push higher from here, but there will be a major correction down the track which will hurt those who pour money in now without regard to value. When? If I (or anyone) could accurately time that they would be on a beach somewhere enjoying life, not writing pieces,or comments, like this.

Ian Radbone
August 01, 2025

What's your evidence that the article is rubbish?

Richie H
August 02, 2025

I agree, investing fresh money now would be interesting to say the least. How much more upside does this market have? 10-20%.. I understand DCA would change your average purchase price a little and thats fine. But fresh bulk cash, wait for the 30-40% down. There's only a couple of days a year where most of your returns are made and it's not when the market frothing more than a fat kid in a cake shop. And TRUMP, wow, just wow!

Go for it
July 31, 2025

Great article.
Put money in when you have the money
Take money out when you need the money.
Feel you don’t know what you’re doing? Use ETF’s. And take the stocking out of it.

Z Nut
July 31, 2025

Thank you for this insightful analysis.
I’m curious how the findings might apply in a scenario like this:
Suppose someone has been consistently investing a fixed monthly amount into ASX:VTS over the past few years. Now, without selling their existing VTS holdings, they continue investing the same monthly amount into ASX:VEQ instead (based on the view that European equities appear less overvalued than U.S. ones).
Has anyone explored how this kind of regional rotation strategy performs over time?

Steve
August 01, 2025

Very much doubt it. All these scenarios tend to presume a one off investment and what happens subsequently. To my knowledge there are no indexes that cover the return of a fixed amount each month over any time frame. Which is what 90% of people actually do when saving. There are quite a few gaps in most of the indexes.

John Derry
July 31, 2025

What about in the context of highest percentile valuations? That usually paints a different picture.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

What do 11 stock market crises over 148 years tell us?

Redefining risk for income investors

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

Supercharging the ‘4% rule’ to ensure a richer retirement

The creator of the 4% rule for retirement withdrawals, Bill Bengen, has written a new book outlining fresh strategies to outlive your money, including holding fewer stocks in early retirement before increasing allocations.

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Are franking credits worth pursuing?

Are franking credits factored into share prices? The data suggests they're probably not, and there are certain types of stocks that offer higher franking credits as well as the prospect for higher returns.

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Latest Updates

A nation of landlords and fund managers

Super and housing dwarf every other asset class in Australia, and they’ve both become too big to fail. Can they continue to grow at current rates, and if so, what are the implications for the economy, work and markets?

Economy

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Retirement

Retiring debt-free may not be the best strategy

Retiring with debt may have advantages. Maintaining a mortgage on the family home can provide a line of credit in retirement for flexibility, extra income, and a DIY reverse mortgage strategy.

Shares

Why the ASX is losing Its best companies

The ASX is shrinking not by accident, but by design. A governance model that rewards detachment over ownership is driving capital into private hands and weakening public markets.

Investment strategies

3 reasons the party in big tech stocks may be over

The AI boom has sparked investor euphoria, but under the surface, US big tech is showing cracks - slowing growth, surging capex, and fading dominance signal it's time to question conventional tech optimism.

Investment strategies

Resilience is the new alpha

Trade is now a strategic weapon, reshaping the investment landscape. In this environment, resilient companies - those capable of absorbing shocks and defending margins - are best positioned to outperform.

Shares

The DNA of long-term compounding machines

The next generation of wealth creation is likely to emerge from founder influenced firms that combine scalable models with long-term alignment. Four signs can alert investors to these companies before the crowds.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.