Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 138

Judging big profits beyond the big headlines

Over the last month, Westpac, NAB and ANZ collectively reported profits of $20.8 billion. This resulted in commentary in the media about banks being too profitable, especially in light of recent moves to reprice loan rates upwards for both investors and owner occupiers. Whilst large corporations generate big profits in dollar terms, debate often ignores the extent to which these profits have to be shared amongst millions of individual shareholders. For example, Commonwealth Bank has 790,000 shareholders with 1.7 billion shares outstanding, all of which have a claim over the $9.1 billion in cash profit that the bank reported in August. This article looks at different measures of corporate profitability for large Australian listed companies, beyond the billion dollar headlines.

Different measures of profitability

As a fund manager, the $7.8 billion of raw profit generated by Westpac does not mean much. I look at the underlying earnings per share (EPS) which is what the owner of a single share of the company receives from the profit generated in a particular year. We also look at growth in EPS, as often a company’s profits can grow substantially when they make an acquisition, but if that acquisition is funded by issuing a large number of additional shares, profit per share might not actually grow. For example, in 2015, toll road operator Transurban reported revenue growth of 39.6% post the acquisition of Queensland Motorways, sensational growth for a steady business. However, distribution per share grew at a still respectable 14% after issuing additional shares to fund the purchase of the new asset. Additionally, at a company level we also look at measures such as returns and profit margins, which can be better measures of how efficient a company’s management team is in generating the annual profits. Furthermore, these measures allow the investor to compare different companies in similar industries.

Return on Equity

Return on Equity (ROE) looks at the profit being generated by the equity that the owners have contributed to establish the business. ROE is calculated by dividing a company’s profit by the money which shareholders have invested in it. This investment by shareholders includes both original share capital from the IPO plus retained earnings. Retained earnings are the profits kept by the company in excess of dividends and are used to fund capital expenditure to either maintain or grow the company. Companies with high ROE typically require little in the way of dilutive equity raisings from shareholders to run their business, or may be highly geared.

The chart above shows the top and bottom five companies in the ASX as ranked by ROE. The top ROE earners contain a fund manager (Magellan), an internet company (, two healthcare companies (CSL and Cochlear) and an education services provider (Navitas).

The common factor in these businesses is minimal ongoing capital expenditure to run the company. Bringing up the rear are a range of capital heavy businesses that require both large amounts of initial capital to start the business and regular capital expenditure to maintain the quality of their assets and finance their ongoing activities. This sub-set includes a winemaker (Treasury), miners (Iluka and Alumina), a steelmaker (BlueScope) and a gain handler (Graincorp).

Return on Assets

Return on Assets (ROA) differs from ROE, as it measures the return a company makes on its total assets. This measure accounts for both the equity and the debt used to purchase the assets that generate a company’s profits.

This chart shows the top and bottom companies in the ASX ranked by ROA. Companies generating a high ROA are generally companies with no debt such as Magellan and or very low debt such as CSL and Carsales. Here the factor driving profits in internet and healthcare companies is generally a smart idea (online real estate listing replacing paper) or a piece of medical research, rather than tangible assets such as steel mills or airplanes bought with capital raised from both shareholders and lenders.

Similarly, fund managers (Magellan) enjoy significant operating leverage, as once the fixed cost of fund distribution, office rent and fund manager salaries are covered by a level of funds under management, each additional dollar of revenue is almost pure profit that requires minimal capital.

Alternatively, companies that have a low return on assets typically require expensive hard assets to generate profit and operate in industries where they are price takers. These assets range from mines (Iluka and Alumina), steel mills (BlueScope) and toll roads (Transurban).

Profit margin

Profit margin is calculated by dividing operating profits by revenues and measures the percentage of each dollar received by a company that results in profit to shareholders. Typically, low margin businesses operate in highly competitive mature industries. The absolute profit margin is not what analysts will look at, but rather the change from year to year, as a declining profit margin may indicate stress and could point to large future declines in profits.

The chart shows the highest profit margins are generated by companies that are monopolies (ASX), fund managers enjoying operating leverage (Magellan and Henderson) or infrastructure owners (Spark, Duet and SP Ausnet). Woodside enjoys a high profit margin, as once large offshore LNG trains are built, these assets have a low marginal cost of production per barrel of oil.

Low profit margin companies characteristically receive large revenues, but operate in intensely competitive industries such as petrol retailing (Caltex), engineering (Worley Parsons) and steel (Sims and BlueScope). Graincorp makes this list due to lower grain exports due to a relatively poor East Coast wheat harvest. Companies with low profit margins are obviously forced to concentrate closely on preventing their profit margins from slipping, as a small change in their margins is likely to have a significant impact on the profit available to be distributed to shareholders.

Whist the banks and the diversified miners generate large absolute profits and generate headlines often gasping at the amount, they are not actually amongst the most profitable large listed Australian companies in terms of profit margins and returns on assets. Westpac’s 35,241 employees produced a $7.8 billion profit in 2015, but this represented a ROE of 15.8% and a profit or net interest margin of only 2.11% on a loan book of $623 billion!

We approach the end of 2015 with our reporting season scorecard for the major banks as follows, with a Gold Star awarded for the best in each category.

Hugh Dive is Senior Portfolio Manager at Aurora Funds Management. This article is general information and does not address the personal circumstances of any individual.



Leave a Comment:



Behind the headline profit numbers


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.