Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 29

That’s racing: financial markets and wagering parallels

My first real experience with risk management was working as a penciller for a bookmaker during my university days. Back then, there were no laptops and the book was actually a real book, not an Excel spreadsheet. The punter would receive a ticket with a largely illegible scrawl indicating details of the wager and hope (if collecting) that the ticket could be translated.

Bookmaking and market parallels

It struck me there are many  parallels between the bookmaking industry and the financial services sector. No doubt a number of participants will gasp in horror at this assertion. ‘Parallels’ may be too strong a contention but perhaps there are some things we can learn from the world of professional wagering and apply to financial services.

For each race we would frame a field with risk (loss) parameters and initially set our board with unduly ‘expensive’ odds. These odds would be adjusted on the basis of betting patterns to attract or dissuade further bets, and an ultimate percentage book set just before the start reflecting preferred risk and return (an efficient frontier maybe? – the first parallel).

For those unfamiliar with the art of bookmaking, each set of odds is converted to a theoretical win percentage, so 3/1 represents a 1 chance in 4 of winning which equals 25%. A book is the cumulative total of odds offered and the theoretical ‘win’ rate is that percentage over 100. However, this makes certain assumptions about betting trends and how the book is weighted.

Data analysis is the second parallel. If there is one place where the amount of publicly available data is close to that of financial markets, it’s the form guide. I can find out how each horse has run under various conditions, with different weights, over multiple distances (with subsequent breakdowns over and within these distances), with a variety of experienced jockeys. If horses were an asset class, I could do a plethora of relative value analyses, which is actually what the bookies do to set odds in the first place – the third parallel.

So, surely this should allow me to make a fully informed decision when betting. Quite possibly, but does fully informed mean successful? Punters (wrongly) believe so. As we’ve seen, it’s how you interpret and what you do with the numbers that matters.

Take the Melbourne Cup. The bookies love it. It is one of the most difficult races to predict as evidenced by the odds on offer. Yet annually, as surely as Xmas comes, every person becomes an expert for the day. Given the amount of (not so smart) money wagered, Xmas does indeed arrive in November for the bookies as they can work their odds far better than when ‘plunges’ or a lack of diverse bets arrive.

“But,” I hear you say. “You must overlay the data with the vagaries of animal instinct - the horse just doesn’t get it or jockey’s poor judgment.” Quite true, but is this a fourth parallel to financial services? Is that akin to when stock pickers (or economists or macro analysts etc) overlay their own expertise after analysing the multitude of data available? Tosh – such facetiousness.

So let's put odds on financial forecasts

Perhaps though, an interesting exercise could be to ask analysts to add a ‘confidence weighting’ (i.e. odds) to their price target or call. I know for certain their number will be either right or wrong (so zero or 1 probability) but the real probability of accuracy lies somewhere in between.

That however doesn’t preclude and possibly invites some neat Bayesian inputs whereby the analyst can suggest ‘odds of X’ that the price target or number will be achieved. One would intuitively think these indications should be odds on given a coin toss is an even money bet. Analysts could change their odds subject to new inputs. They already change their price targets regularly.

Why not extend this to those wonderful business news articles where a cross section of experts is asked to opine on every main economic and financial indicator in the next 12 months? Please add odds so we can see how well you rate your form.

Consider the implications. One could start to follow an expert with far more confidence based on their form. An ‘outsider’ might be considered if they show some relative movement in form and we agree that all things mean revert eventually.

Moving from parallels, here’s what I consider the main difference between the bookies and the financial experts. If the former gets his efficient frontier and relative value analysis wrong, he loses his own money. Now, I am not suggesting that the complexities of financial forecasting and analytics be subject to individual penalties for experts being wrong but conversely, shouldn’t there be some degree of accountability? Particularly if they are wrong to a very meaningful extent. Perhaps the Form Guide for Financial Expertise? We would definitely have the data.

And we should extend this discussion in “That’s Racing Part 2: Revenge of the Disaffected Banker”  to the ability of asset consultants to pick the best managers for asset classes.

But such an idea would be hobbled before it reached the finishing line.

 

Paul Umbrazunas worked for a bookmaker whilst at university before a long career in financial markets including debt capital markets, syndicate, ALM and Chief Operating Officer roles across Goldman Sachs, BZW, Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How can you not be bullish the US?

The role of financial markets when earnings are falling

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Which generation had it toughest?

Each generation believes its economic challenges were uniquely tough - but what does the data say? A closer look reveals a more nuanced, complex story behind the generational hardship debate. 

Maybe it’s time to consider taxing the family home

Australia could unlock smarter investment and greater equity by reforming housing tax concessions. Rethinking exemptions on the family home could benefit most Australians, especially renters and owners of modest homes.

100 Aussies: seven charts on who earns, pays, and owns

The Labor government is talking up tax reform to lift Australia’s ailing economic growth. Before any changes are made, it’s important to know who pays tax, who owns assets, and how much people have in their super for retirement.

The best way to get rich and retire early

This goes through the different options including shares, property and business ownership and declares a winner, as well as outlining the mindset needed to earn enough to never have to work again.

A perfect storm for housing affordability in Australia

Everyone has a theory as to why housing in Australia is so expensive. There are a lot of different factors at play, from skewed migration patterns to banking trends and housing's status as a national obsession.

Chinese steel - building a Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes

China's steel production, equivalent to building one Sydney Harbour Bridge every 10 minutes, has driven Australia's economic growth. With China's slowdown, what does this mean for Australia's economy and investments?

Latest Updates

Economy

Why we should follow Canada and cut migration

An explosion in low-skilled migration to Australia has depressed wages, killed productivity, and cut rental vacancy rates to near decades-lows. It’s time both sides of politics addressed the issue.

Investing

Simple maths says the AI investment boom ends badly

This AI cycle feels less like a revolution and more like a rerun. Just like fibre in 2000, shale in 2014, and cannabis in 2019, the technology or product is real but the capital cycle will be brutal. Investors beware.

Property

Australian house price speculators: What were you thinking?

Australian housing’s 50-year boom was driven by falling rates and rising borrowing power — not rent or yield. With those drivers exhausted, future returns must reconcile with economic fundamentals. Are we ready?

Shares

ASX reporting season: Room for optimism

Despite mixed ASX results, the market has shown surprising resilience. With rate cuts ahead and economic conditions improving, investors should look beyond short-term noise and position for a potential cyclical upswing.

Property

A Bunnings play without the hefty price tag

BWT Trust has moved to bring management in house. Meanwhile, many of the properties it leases to Bunnings have been repriced to materially higher rents. This has removed two of the key 'snags' holding back the stock.

Investment strategies

Replacing bank hybrids with something similar

With APRA phasing out bank hybrids from 2027, investors must reassess these complex instruments. A synthetic hybrid strategy may offer similar returns but with greater control and clearer understanding of risks.

Shares

Nvidia's CEO is selling. Here's why Aussie investors should care

The magnitude of founder Jensen Huang’s selldown may seem small, but the signal is hard to ignore. When the person with the clearest insight into the company’s future starts cashing out, it’s worth asking why.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.