Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 415

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

The world’s annual $120 trillion economy increasingly depends on just six mega-tech businesses – Facebook, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, Amazon, Tencent and Alibaba – to function properly. You would think they would continue to all be obvious inclusions in portfolios but investors today have a menu of reasons to avoid or even sell mega-tech investments.

After a strong 2020, many investors are worried all the 'easy money has been made' – a commonly used phrase we hear in our industry which also suffers from acute hindsight bias. Investors are also worried inflation will drive interest rates higher and compress the earnings multiples of higher-growth businesses.

Mega-tech investments also seem boring now – a surprisingly strong criterion some investors seek to avoid. And, of course, there are the never-ending headlines pointing to regulatory pressures across the sector.

Tech has underperformed year-to-date

Yet our analysis shows that mega-tech stocks not only offer some of the best growth opportunities, but also offer some of the best ‘value’ opportunities in the market today. We see material upside in all six of these mega technology businesses. Given the combination of strong and growing advantages, enormous growth opportunities, and material undervaluation today, we believe these names should form the core of any global equities portfolio.

Investors shouldn’t rotate out of mega-tech to value because mega-tech are value.

Our investment philosophy is to own long-term winning businesses operating in the world’s most attractive markets, without overpaying. These mega-tech businesses meet these criteria in the strongest way and they form the core of our portfolio.

Below we look at the top three reasons why mega-tech stocks are some of today’s best value stocks.

1. Mega-techs have the best businesses … ever?

The first reason is that the business quality of today’s mega-techs is among the highest that humans have ever created. They dominate global data, benefit from enormous ecosystems, and have superior economics and scale. The huge cash flows and profits these businesses generate can be reinvested in new business opportunities, spurring fresh rounds of growth. These mega-techs all have a vast array of high-probability growth options in enormous new TAMs (total addressable markets).

Take Facebook, for example. More than 3 billion members log in and spend significant time each month on its platforms. It is unquestionably the world’s best platform for marketers to reach customers. Facebook’s revenues and earnings have been largely driven by the company monetising around 10 million businesses who pay for the company’s digital marketing services. But approximately 200 million businesses use Facebook today, as well as another 200 million ‘creators’.

Facebook is now investing heavily in its conversion and monetisation capabilities, particularly in eCommerce and creator monetisation tools. This will unlock the enormous latent revenue opportunity of these currently non-paying businesses and creators. It gives us great confidence that Facebook’s future revenue and earnings power will be multiples of its current levels.

Facebook: Only a tiny fraction of customers monetise today

Alphabet is also leveraging its advantages in data, talent and time to become a clear global leader in artificial intelligence (AI), which will not only strengthen its existing advantages in its core advertising, cloud and productivity businesses, but will also create brand new businesses, such as Verily which is leveraging Alphabet’s data advantages to solve problems in life sciences and healthcare.

And, of course, one of the biggest areas of future mega-tech growth is the cloud. Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet, along with Alibaba and Tencent in China, dominate the cloud. Microsoft CEO, Satya Nadella, estimates there will be approximately $8 trillion in incremental IT spend each year globally by 2030, of which cloud-based services and applications will no doubt claim the lion’s share. For the leading cloud providers, their advantages in scale, data and customer captivity will only continue to strengthen over time. Said another way, this is a space for which enormous growth is largely assured and for which the winners have already been defined today. This means that the future revenues and earnings power of these businesses will also be multiples of their current levels.

2. Inflation concerns are overdone

The second reason mega-tech provides fantastic value is that investors are too worried about inflation and what that could mean for interest rates and valuations. Over the first six months of this year, equities in the technology sector have underperformed the broader market largely because investors feared rising rates would slash tech valuations.

We believe those fears and the sell-off are overdone. While we note the same strong headline inflation numbers as everyone else, we struggle to see an extended acceleration in core inflation.

For a start, over the short-term, there remains significant slack in the labour markets relative to pre-pandemic levels, which should limit the acceleration in wage growth. Secondly, our analysis of Chinese credit growth shows a clear and substantial slowing, which is a strong leading indicator for cooling global commodities demand growth over the next 6-12 months.

We also expect structural disinflationary forces – such as ageing populations, labour-disrupting automation technologies and global corporate and government indebtedness – to persist for decades.

Indebtedness: The upward trend has accelerated

But something that has not yet been tested in any meaningful way is the pricing power of our mega-tech businesses. Should these businesses find it easy to increase their prices in an inflationary environment, then this goes some way to insulating investors from the negative effects of inflation. We believe the latent pricing power in these businesses is likely very strong – and in some cases, extraordinarily so.

Take Microsoft 365, for example – arguably one of the most mission-critical software packages upon which many hundreds of millions of employees are reliant each day. This costs just US$32/month, vastly below any reasonable estimate for the value it adds, strongly supporting our latent pricing power hypothesis.

Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

3. Current valuations are too conservative

The final reason that mega-tech stocks are great value is their attractive valuations. Our analysis shows that the expectations baked into the current stock prices of our big-tech names are far too conservative.

  • In the case of three dominant US cloud providers, Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet, for example, their implied collective annual cloud revenues by 2030 are in the order of just $650 billion higher than current levels, according to consensus estimates. This is a tiny fraction of the $8 trillion increment that Microsoft CEO Nadella expects to accrue to the tech space over the next decade. If Nadella’s forecast above is even remotely accurate, then these cloud providers will see much higher revenues (and earnings) in 2030 than what is currently being implied by consensus estimates.

  • Next, consider Tencent and Alibaba, the latter of which has of course suffered greatly from the Jack Ma saga, with the billionaire Alibaba founder’s fintech Ant Group IPO pulled at the last minute and with Ma reportedly under serious pressure from Chinese regulators and Government. In both cases, despite owning some of the most valuable data ecosystems in China and South-East Asia – including being the two dominant cloud providers on the Mainland – their respective stock prices imply very conservative sets of expectations. Said another way, if revenue growth for these businesses were to fall from healthy-double-digits, to just single-digits by 2025, an investor today would still make money, based on Montaka’s analysis.

  • And finally, the biggest head-scratcher of them all is Facebook, which is priced at a forward earnings multiple of just 14x. Some of the businesses trading at a higher multiple than this today include Australia’s Wesfarmers, Scentre Group, and plumbing parts supplier, Reece. At the current stock price, the market is effectively giving investors all of the upside from eCommerce, the monetisation of the creator economy, WhatsApp, Messenger and Reels, as well as Facebook’s growth in VR/AR for free!

Spectacular potential

As the global economy grows, we are all becoming even more dependent on the highest-quality mega-tech winners.

Today, the collective revenues of these six businesses account for just 1% of global GDP. By 2030, global GDP will probably be around $160 trillion per annum, and these businesses will account for a much larger share than today.

For the patient investor who can look through the short-term noise, we believe these businesses are strong candidates to form the core of any global equities portfolio today. At Montaka, we will continue to own these businesses in size while their prices make sense. Patiently owning the winning businesses in the world’s most attractive industries without overpaying is the way Montaka believes in safely compounding capital over the long term.


Andrew Macken is Chief Investment Officer at Montaka Global Investments. This article is general information and is based on an understanding of current legislation.


July 11, 2021

Another tech company is ZOOM..... that showed a capacity for lateral thing that resulted in a great capacity for lateral thinking contributing to our communications during C19. Further development of their systems expertise should not only protect this valuable resource for our communications generally, but also provide future dividends to it's shareholders. It should be up there.

July 11, 2021

And of course the toxic sludge of fake news, massive censorship (even of experts in their field around C19 and associated experimental therapies silenced/banned) spewing forth from some of these bigger than god behemoth brands, is not at all an issue. Wow.

July 09, 2021

I agree with this analysis, these are six of the greatest ever companies. So why not just buy all six directly, the problem with holding them via a fund is all sort of other stuff gets thrown in.

July 08, 2021

Why do these articles never include Twitter. It seems the favourite ways to communicate for hundreds of millions of people, and its share price has risen a lot lately. Are they struggling to monetise?

July 08, 2021

While I agree with your sentiment 100% you need to be careful when calling these 'tech' companies and then looking at that sector's returns to justify part of your thesis. Only one of the companies is in the Technology Sector.

Amazon/Ali Baba - Consumer Discretionary
Alphabet/Tencent/Facebook - Telecommunications (or Communication Services as it is called now)
Actually only Microsoft, from your examples, is a 'Tech' company.

The Technology Sector is weighed down by 'old' tech.

July 08, 2021

I wholeheartedly agree with this article's sentiments. The valuations of these gigantic companies is not stretched at all - they are money making machines.

July 08, 2021

When you look at their share prices from five years ago until now, they have all achieved over 150% growth in share prices.
They are money making machines, however the average person could not afford to invest in those companies.


Leave a Comment:



The ‘cosmic’ forces leading the US to Modern Monetary Theory

Policy pincers in Australia and the US

US rate rises would challenge multi-asset diversified portfolios


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.