Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 77

Policy pincers in Australia and the US

In the US, the two big policy imperatives – unemployment and inflation – have been going in the right direction (down) since 2011. Ultra-loose fiscal policy (four years of trillion dollar budget deficits) and ultra-loose monetary policy (near- zero interest rates and unprecedented money printing) have borne fruit, albeit slowly:- the economy is growing, the unemployment rate is falling, the budget deficit is contracting, deflation has been avoided, inflation has been low, and asset prices are rising (including shares, bonds, housing and commercial property). The ‘QE’ money printing program is coming to an end without rattling asset markets or investor confidence.

Falling unemployment plus very low inflation, despite the strong dollar and tightening budget, mean the Fed can start tightening monetary policy by raising interest rates. The big risk is that the Fed continues to dismiss rising inflation as ‘noise’, and keeps interest rates too low for too long. The likely outcome is that the Fed will wait too long and have to hit hard with unexpected interest rate hikes, rattling investment markets, as in 1994.

Standing behind Fed Chair Janet Yellen now is the new Fed Vice Chairman Stan Fischer who, as head of Israel’s central bank from 2005 to 2013, used aggressive money printing to over-stimulate the Israeli economy, resulting in high inflation and a roaring housing bubble.

Investors want to see the Fed keep interest rates low for longer, but not for so long that it will be forced to act suddenly and unexpectedly to tackle inflation. All eyes and ears are on Yellen and how she views inflation and unemployment. In July she indicated that the rising inflation was merely “noise”; that monetary policy (rate hikes) should not be used to address asset bubbles; and that her main focus is now on ‘under-employment’, which is running at twice the rate of unemployment. In her Jackson Hole address at the end of August she hinted at possible rate rises early in 2015, rather than mid-year. But she also made it clear that she would be very careful and responsive to any adverse effects of rate rises on growth or employment.

It is the reverse in Australia. Here we have rising unemployment rates and rising inflation. In addition we still have very loose, and now politically chaotic, fiscal policy (big budget deficits and a hostile, volatile Senate). Inflation is already at the top end of the RBA’s target range but the RBA cannot raise interest rates to kill inflation and cool the housing market for fear of causing the dollar and unemployment to rise even further.

August saw the unemployment rate rise to 6.4%, up from a pre-GFC boom-time low of 3.9% in February 2008 at the peak of the commodities boom. Inflation is now up to 3%, the top of the RBA’s target range, and up from just 1.2% two years ago. Even ‘core’ inflation is now 2.9%. July also marked the start of the new Senate, with Palmer and other micro parties making fiscal policy and genuine economic reforms more challenging. This is dampening business confidence and investment and may necessitate the RBA providing monetary support for longer – ie keep interest rates low for longer.

As a result, the RBA, like the Fed in the US, will also probably act too late and too harshly with rate hikes. Indeed the RBA may even try another rate cut first to try to bring down the dollar. This would probably further inflame prices in the property and share markets, as well as accelerate consumer price inflation. That would mean it would need to come down even harder and harsher with rate hikes later on.

 

Ashley Owen is Joint CEO of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund.

 

1 Comments
Jerome Lander
September 05, 2014

Great article Ashley. For anyone left wondering why the markets are rising they need look no further than this. Excessively easy monetary policy has helped drive markets up and may well continue to do so for the time being, or at least until it becomes clearer that rates can rise as well as fall.

Investor portfolios are largely speaking completely dependent on this - sharemarkets, housing, infrastructure, property, bonds - you name it.

There are few real alternatives and they can't compete on price performance in this environment. Nonetheless prudent investors need to consider how much monetary policy risk they are willing to own, which is almost the same in this environment as saying how much risk they are willing to take. As markets continue to rise, and we get closer to the time to expectations of an interest rate rise, this risk will just become more and more acute.

This is a potentially very profitable but very risky environment for investors. Market timers will be nervously monitoring expectations as timing becomes more critical than ever. Those who reduce their risk exposures before the markets more broadly know interest rates rises are coming will be the ones who get to keep their (impressive) gains from their risky long only portfolios. Investors do not know yet when that time will be - it may be a while off yet or 2015 may indeed be an interesting year.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Brace, brace, brace: The real issue behind the banking turmoil

Is it all falling apart for central banks?

Reserve Bank has both a date and data dilemma

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.