Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 84

Are bonds liquid?

Investors are increasingly asking whether bonds are liquid and what risks exist if they aren’t. In recent years Blackrock has written frequently on this topic with their latest piece noting that despite the growth in the total value of bonds outstanding globally, the market is becoming increasingly fragmented. They point out that some US banks have more than 1,000 bonds outstanding, with some large corporates having dozens of bonds on issue. Other articles have pointed to the decreasing size of trades and with new regulations, banks are increasingly becoming trade arrangers rather than middlemen using their balance sheets. The problems are known, but there’s seemingly little momentum to change the status quo.

Proposals to improve bond liquidity

Blackrock has proposed that issuers should move to fewer, larger bonds (perhaps a maximum of one maturity per year) with standardised terms. This would dramatically reduce the total number of bonds outstanding as well as reducing the seemingly subtle differences in terms that govern each bond. The recent push to include ‘collective action’ clauses in all sovereign bonds is an attempt to standardise terms.

Another suggestion to improve liquidity is for trading to migrate to exchanges rather than through brokers, with a centralised order system making it easier for buyers and sellers to find their match. Listed notes in Australia have achieved good levels of trading helped by transparent prices and orders. If the brand name and yield is attractive, issues of more than $1 billion are possible with the latest Commonwealth Bank issue gathering $3 billion.

However, listed notes come with increased volatility in prices relative to unlisted bonds, with non-institutional investors arguably having less of a focus on fundamentals and more of a focus on sentiment.

An example of why all of this is important is highlighted by recent news on Pimco, with the departure of Bill Gross triggering a wave of redemptions from both its Total Return Funds. The ETF version of the Total Return Fund is currently being investigated by the US securities regulator (the SEC) over its pricing mechanics. The SEC investigation is dealing with one of the long-standing issues with bonds: how do you value holdings of unlisted securities of varying sizes and different terms, when some have traded recently and others haven’t? The initial claims are that the Pimco ETF was buying small parcels of bonds, which trade at a discount to larger parcels due to their lower liquidity, and then having those bonds marked up in value to the levels that larger parcels had most recently traded at.

In normal times there wouldn’t be any concerns about the liquidity of the ETF. However, with redemptions of approximately 15% in two days following the departure of Bill Gross concerns have been raised. Could the ETF become illiquid if the redemptions continue at a high rate? Could the previously profitable strategy of buying smaller discounted bonds come back to bite Pimco?

Watch liquidity risk as well as credit risk

Illiquidity issues can become a self-fulfilling prophecy as the more liquid positions are sold to fund redemptions leaving a rump of illiquid positions. ETFs and managed funds with daily or weekly liquidity are particularly susceptible to being caught out. These vehicles should only be holding the most liquid securities, matching the very high level of liquidity they offer their clients. Australians with a decent memory will remember the billions locked up in mortgage funds when the financial crisis hit – a classic case of liquidity mismatch. Long dated illiquid mortgages, although in many cases very low risk, were unable to be sold to meet redemption requests flooding in.

Increasingly, bond investors need to consider not just the credit risk but also the liquidity risk of their holdings. Very small or very large holdings of individual issues, as well as esoteric securities, are particularly prone to being difficult to trade. Liquidity is also cyclical, with this summed up in the common fund manager euphemism that “liquidity is always available except when you need it”. This was seen for both listed and unlisted securities during the financial crisis with the buy/sell spread widening from basis points to percentage points in some cases. Buying smaller ticket securities at a discount is a legitimate strategy to generate alpha but it is suitable only for investors who have a ‘buy to hold’ outlook. Some investors want to receive a liquidity premium on the securities they invest in but they don’t want any limitations on the liquidity of their investment. You can’t have the best of both worlds. It will end badly.

But investors still want liquidity

The two main reasons investors want liquidity are:

  • they want the ability to sell if their own situation changes, or
  • they want the ability to sell if the investment outlook changes.

Each is understandable, but they impact the way investments should be made and limit the risk that should be taken. If liquidity is needed for personal situational changes then short tenor securities or very low risk securities are the best match. There has to be a compromise and that will be a reduced credit spread earned.

Liquidity for investment outlook changes is a different story. I’m a strong believer in the Warren Buffett maxim that investors should only buy securities that they are happy to own if the market closes for 10 years. If the long term return for risk isn’t acceptable now then that is ripe for a future correction. Many investors believe they can foresee the signs of a market peak, yet very few have acted correctly and consistently at market peaks. For the vast majority of investors, by the time they’ve recognised the signs of a downturn the prices have shifted down well beyond their desired selling level.

Other benefits of bonds

When there is a comparison between investment opportunities in different asset classes there are two additional points that are critical. Firstly, debt securities have the added benefit of either a hard maturity date or an amortisation pathway. Secondly, debt securities have a slice of equity below them that takes the first losses.

If you get the initial investment call a little bit (but not a lot) wrong, the security price will likely be marked down but then gradually work its way back to face value as it approaches maturity. You’re not stuck forever hoping for a business or market turnaround: there’s an approaching date when things will come good. A maturity date is effectively a second form of liquidity, but with a far more reliable timeframe and price. In a time of crisis, an approaching maturity is doubly valuable as it allows for the cash received to be re-invested into other securities at cyclically low levels.


Jonathan Rochford is Portfolio Manager at Narrow Road Capital. This article has been prepared for educational purposes and is not meant as a substitute for professional and tailored financial advice. Narrow Road Capital advises on and invests in a wide range of securities.


Leave a Comment:



Why 2020 has been the year of the bond market

Global credit valuations: are we there yet?

Will ETF liquidity be there when I need it?


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates


$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.


Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.