Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 589

How will stocks fare with a smaller US government?

With the best post-election day performance for the S&P 500 in decades and a continued bid for stocks in the days after, investors are enthusiastic about the policies that may be put forth during a second Trump term.

Investors have particularly welcomed Trump’s focus on deregulation and for the federal government to play a smaller role in the economy and financial markets.

The government has been a very large player

The purpose of capitalism is the allocation of societal resources by the private markets. Instead of bureaucrats, capitalist systems prefer to allow the 'wisdom of crowds' to determine what projects should be funded and where capital should be pulled from to drive societal growth.

How much has government been involved in this process? Since the global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008, the answer is a lot.

Exhibit 1 charts the ratio of US government debt to GDP, which has grown from 68% before the financial crisis to an astonishing almost 130% today.

Exhibit 2 captures the growth of the size of the US Federal Reserve’s balance sheet as a percentage of the economy since the turn of the century. From its average of 5% pre-GFC, it has ballooned to 25% today. Twenty-five cents out of every dollar of GDP is held by the US central bank. Said another way, the supply of money has exploded.

Finally, COVID stimulus policies, from the CARES Act to the American Rescue Plan, resulted in over US$5 trillion being fed into the US economy, culminating in a fiscal deficit rivaling only wartime periods.

For those surprised that the US avoided recession in the last year or two, the explanation is simple: The economic soft landing the US is experiencing was purchased at great cost.

How did stocks fare during this period of exponential government growth? Starting at the beginning of the Obama administration to the end of October 2024, the S&P 500 returned 839% for an annualized return of around 15%.1 Whether under President Obama, Trump or Biden, stocks greatly exceeded normal historical return and risk profiles.

Via monetary and fiscal policies, the US government’s involvement in the private sector effectively allowed for the privatization of wealth in good times and for the socialization of losses in bad ones.

This has reduced the ability of the private sector to efficiently price risk and allocate capital and resources under both Democratic and Republican administrations. So where might we go from here, with deregulation ahead, but also tariffs?

The look ahead

While most (certainly me) welcome less regulation and intervention by policymakers, investors need to consider our starting point today. The exhibit below, which is the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio for US equities over the last 100 years, may help.

While prices today aren’t as high as they were during the 1990s internet bubble, given the historical return of risk assets, we shouldn’t be too surprised to see that they compare to the levels of the late 1920s. However, I’m not suggesting a redux of October 1929, or another Great Depression, as there are too many differences between the periods.

While valuation is one similarity, valuation alone can be a dangerous investment signal. Importantly, investors need to consider the pathway of future earnings, the denominator in the chart above, and the prime determinant of the prices investors will pay. Which brings me to one other similarity to the late 1920s: tariffs.

In 1929, investors began to discount the Republican Congress’s plans to tariff over 25,000 goods entering the US. This mattered to investors because, while tariffs make US goods more attractive to domestic buyers, they drive up costs for US producers sourcing goods outside the country as well as consumers. While there were other catalysts heading into October 1929, the prospects of the Smoot-Hawley tariffs were a factor that changed both how investors thought about future profits and what they were willing to pay.

To be fair, long before the 2024 election, input costs had risen as capital and labor costs jumped. But companies were largely able to offset those pressures by passing on higher prices to customers and cutting spending in non-mission critical areas. What has changed is consumers have begun substituting goods and services where necessary, driving prices and inflation down, and lowering corporate spending in unnecessary areas. With the low-hanging fruit already plucked, profit margin protecting maneuvers will be harder to achieve in the future, bringing forward a new paradigm with far greater return dispersion in benchmarks.

In conclusion, less government involvement in the economy and markets is long overdue and welcome. But I think investors need to consider what a reduced government role may mean for the profitability of projects and businesses that are unable to offset rising cost pressures. As a result, I think Trump 2.0, specifically smaller government, may upend the performance dominance of passive investing.

Endnotes

1 Source: Bloomberg, S&P 500. Cumulative and annualized return calculated using monthly data from 31 January 2009 to 31 October 2024. Returns are gross and in USD.

 

Robert M. Almeida is a Global Investment Strategist and Portfolio Manager at MFS Investment Management. This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to invest in any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It has been prepared without taking into account any personal objectives, financial situation or needs of any specific person. Comments, opinions and analysis are rendered as of the date given and may change without notice due to market conditions and other factors. This article is issued in Australia by MFS International Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 68 607 579 537, AFSL 485343), a sponsor of Firstlinks.

For more articles and papers from MFS, please click here.

Unless otherwise indicated, logos and product and service names are trademarks of MFS® and its affiliates and may be registered in certain countries.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

The 2020 US presidential elections

How much will you risk to feel comfortable?

Once in a lifetime returns from US shares

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are LICs licked?

LICs are continuing to struggle with large discounts and frustrated investors are wondering whether it’s worth holding onto them. This explains why the next 6-12 months will be make or break for many LICs.

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 627 with weekend update

This week, I got the news that my mother has dementia. It came shortly after my father received the same diagnosis. This is a meditation on getting old and my regrets in not getting my parents’ affairs in order sooner.

  • 4 September 2025

5 charts every retiree must see…

Retirement can be daunting for Australians facing financial uncertainty. Understand your goals, longevity challenges, inflation impacts, market risks, and components of retirement income with these crucial charts.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Super crosses the retirement Rubicon

Australia's superannuation system faces a 'Rubicon' moment, a turning point where the focus is shifting from accumulation phase to retirement readiness, but unfortunately, many funds are not rising to the challenge.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Superannuation

Meg on SMSFs: Indexation of Division 296 tax isn't enough

Labor is reviewing the $3 million super tax's most contentious aspects: lack of indexation and the tax on unrealised gains. Those fighting for change shouldn’t just settle for indexation of the threshold.

Shares

Will ASX dividends rise over the next 12 months?

Market forecasts for ASX dividend yields are at a 30-year low amid fears about the economy and the capacity for banks and resource companies to pay higher dividends. This pessimism seems overdone.

Shares

Expensive market valuations may make sense

World share markets seem toppy at first glance, though digging deeper reveals important nuances. While the top 2% of stocks are pricey, they're also growing faster, and the remaining 98% are inexpensive versus history.

Fixed interest

The end of the strong US dollar cycle

The US dollar’s overvaluation, weaker fundamentals, and crowded positioning point to further downside. Diversifying into non-US equities and emerging market debt may offer opportunities for global investors.

Investment strategies

Today’s case for floating rate notes

Market volatility and uncertainty in 2025 prompt the need for a diversified portfolio. Floating Rate Notes offer stability, income, and protection against interest rate risks, making them a valuable investment option.

Strategy

Breaking down recent footy finals by the numbers

In a first, 2025 saw AFL and NRL minor premiers both go out in straight sets. AFL data suggests the pre-finals bye is weakening the stranglehold of top-4 sides more than ever before.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.