Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 315

It’s the large stocks driving fund misery

The first six months of calendar 2019 have again superbly proved why this equities bull market has been dubbed “the most hated in history”. At face value, equity markets have rallied by up to 20% suggesting making money from asset price inflation via the share market has seldom been easier for investors. A closer look reveals nothing could be further from the truth.

Amazing highs and lows

Imagine an investment portfolio consisting of Adelaide Brighton, Bank of Queensland, Challenger, Caltex Australia, Domino’s Pizza, Flight Centre, Link Administration, Pendal Group (the old BT Investments), South32 and the old Westfield, now Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield.

An equal-weighted portfolio of these 10 household names in Australia generated a negative return of nearly -10% between 1 January and 30 June 2019. That’s ex-dividends, but the average yield from the portfolio cannot fully compensate for the erosion in capital values. Besides, the S&P/ASX200 Accumulation index was up nearly 20% over the same period.

And that’s assuming investors were not caught out by disasters such as Syrah Resources (-39%), Wagners (-42%) or Bionomics (-72%), and numerous others.

Many a self-managing investor has portfolio exposure to the big four banks, large resources and energy producers, as well as Telstra, Woolworths, and Wesfarmers-Coles. They don’t necessarily need to compare their performance with a benchmark, so they most likely are feeling happy with the Big Bounce post the Grand Sell-Off during the closing months of 2018. In particular, if they also managed to pick up some additional gains from smaller cap high flyers such as Afterpay Touch, Austal and Credit Corp.

Fund managers doing it tough and consolidating

For professional fund managers, however, the scenarios for share markets in 2018/2019 have made beating the index an extremely tough challenge at a time when ETF providers offer ever-cheaper alternatives and retail investors feel emboldened about their own talent and capabilities.

It should thus be no surprise that, with the notable exception of Magellan Financial (MFG), most listed asset managers have been relegated to underperformers on the ASX, with shares in Janus Henderson (JHG), Platinum Asset Management (PTM), Elanor Investors Group (ENN), K2 Asset Management (KAM), Pinnacle Investment Management (PNI), and others overwhelmingly in the doghouse at a time when most investors feel like celebrating.

The industry of actively-managed investment funds is ripe for consolidation, or otherwise a shake-out. Locally, all major banks with exception of Westpac (WBC) have unveiled plans to divest their wealth management operations, while Magellan Financial acquiring Airlie Funds Management and Ellerston Capital acquiring Morphic Asset Management are but two early indications the industry locally is equally facing major transformation in the years ahead.

But why exactly is it that most active managers cannot beat their benchmark?

One narrative is that investor exuberance is largely to blame. With stocks like Afterpay Touch (APT), Appen (APX) and other smaller cap technology stocks up 100% and more, the narrative goes that institutional investors cannot justify owning these expensive stocks, making beating the index a near impossible task.

Sounds plausible, yes? Except that it doesn’t stand up to the test of deeper analysis.

The myth of the WAAAX

Financials make up more than 30% of the S&P/ASX200 (of which the Big Four banks more than 20%) while Materials and Energy adds another 23%. Combined, these sectors represent more than 50% of the index. Add a few extra-large cap names such as Macquarie Group, CSL, Telstra, Woolworths and Wesfarmers and the index representation rises above 66%.

In most years, underperforming or outperforming against the index is determined by how these large cap stocks perform versus exposure in investment portfolios.

The WAAAX stocks as a group, comprising of Wisetech Global, Afterpay Touch, Appen, Altium, and Xero, represented a total index weight of only 1.58% at 1 June 2019. The average gain from these five stocks is a smidgen over 80%. However, Fortescue Metals (FMG) alone weighs 1.35% and its shares went up by more than 117%. Plus, Fortescue pays a big dividend and the WAAAX stocks don’t.

In other words: Fortescue Metals shares have contributed more to the index gains than all of the WAAAX stocks combined. That’s one myth gone.

This example does, however, further highlight one of the key characteristics of the local share market in recent years: the internal polarisation is enormous. The gap between winners and losers is extremely wide and both baskets contain plenty of household names each. It makes outperforming the index not only a case of picking enough winners; it’s equally about avoiding the losers.

With most professional funds managers in Australia practicing a value-oriented approach, owning share market disappointments is pretty much par for the course, especially as corporate profit warnings came out in large numbers throughout May and June.

Making matters worse, most managers have been running their funds with larger-than-usual allocations to cash, and many have missed the large cap resource stocks. BHP Group (BHP) shares added 21%-plus ex-dividend, which is better than the index, while Rio Tinto (RIO) rallied 32% ex-dividend and Fortescue more than doubled. In the Energy sector, Woodside Petroleum (WPL) narrowly underperformed the index including dividend, but Santos (STO) shares went up by 29%.

Most fund performance due to large cap investments

What these numbers show is that underperforming or outperforming the local index over the past six months has been determined by a few large cap stocks only. Woolworths and Wesfarmers did not keep up with the index. In their place, large cap names Amcor (AMC), Brambles (BXB) and Telstra (TLS) – probably best described as ‘come back stocks’- all posted stronger than average gains.

Add Aristocrat Leisure (ALL) up 43% ex-dividend, Goodman Group (GMG) up 37% ex-div, Transurban (TCL) up 25.5% ex-div, and Newcrest Mining (NCM) up 51% ex-div and it is clear most of the strong index gains this year occurred on the shoulders of no more than 10 large cap stocks in Australia.

The most outstanding themes have been iron ore, gold, lower interest rates and bond yields, and structural growth stories in the case of Aristocrat Leisure, Goodman Group and the WAAAX companies. At the same time, less confidence and more investor caution has swung the market pendulum heavily back in favour of the large caps.

The Small Ordinaries index barely scraped in a positive return for full financial year 2019, and if we include dividends, it delivered 1.9%. Over the past six months, the Small Ordinaries’ total return was 16.8%. The Top 20 gained 26.7% ex-dividends.

The negative performance for stocks including Scentre Group and UR-Westfield contrasts sharply with the market-beating performances for Goodman Group and Transurban. In prior times, all four would have been considered beneficiaries of lower bond yields. This time around, however, investors are excluding the structural challenges from online competition and household budgets under pressure.

After five years of notable neglect, value stocks have made a sharp come-back post the late 2018 sell-off, as witnessed by (some) bank stocks, and via selective names among media companies, consumer-oriented businesses and resources stocks. Meanwhile, the lure of disruptors and new technology-driven business models has not disappeared.

The latter remains equally one of the key characteristics of this hated bull market. Hated by the fund managers who are supposed to be the experts.

 

Rudi Filapek-Vandyck is an Editor at the FNArena newsletter. This article has been prepared for educational purposes and is not meant to be a substitute for tailored financial advice.

FNArena offers independent and unbiased tools and insights for self-researching investors. The service can be trialed at www.fnarena.com.

RELATED ARTICLES

Why August company reporting season was poor

Headwinds and tailwinds, a decade in review

How we have invested during COVID-19

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 373

It was a milestone for strange times last week when the company with the longest record in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index, ExxonMobil, once the largest company in the world, was replaced by a software company, Salesforce. Only one company in the original DJIA exists today. As businesses are disrupted, how many of the current DJIA companies will disappear in the next decade or two?

  • 2 September 2020

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

COVID-19 and the events of 2020 show why, more than ever, SMSF trustees need to prepare for the ‘unexpected’ by having an Enduring Power of Attorney in place. A Power of Attorney is not enough.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Shares

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

Gold

Interview Series: Why it’s gold’s time to shine

With gold now on the radar of individual investors, SMSFs and institutions, here's what you need to know about the choices between gold bars, gold ETFs and even gold miners, with Jordan Eliseo. 

SMSF strategies

SMSFs during COVID-19 and your 14-point checklist

SMSFs come with an administration burden underestimated by many. For example, did you know trustees need to document a member’s decision to take the reduced pension minimum under the new COVID rules?

Retirement

Funding retirement through a stock market crash

On the surface, a diversified fund looks the same as an SMSF with the same asset allocations. But to fund retirement, a member must sell units in the fund, whereas the cash balance is used in an SMSF.

Australia’s debt and interest burden: can we afford it?

Australia has an ageing population and rising welfare and health costs, but it is still the best placed among its ‘developed’ country peers. Here's why the expected levels of debt are manageable.

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 375

There are many ways to value a company, but the most popular is to estimate the future cash flows and discount them to a present value using a chosen interest rate. Does it follow that when interest rates fall, companies become more valuable? Perhaps, but only if the cash flows remain unchanged, and in a recession, future earnings are more difficult to sustain. What do Buffett and Douglass and 150 years of data say?

  • 16 September 2020
  • 5

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.