Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 421

US rate rises would challenge multi-asset diversified portfolios

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) Board surprised the markets at its August meeting by continuing with the scheduled reduction in bond purchases announced in July. It had been thought that the COVID-induced lockdowns and inflation outlook would push the Board into formalising a delay. The relative sanguinity of the RBA Board can be attributed to a number of factors.

First, as the RBA Governor noted in his statement “the experience to date has been that once virus outbreaks are contained, the economy bounces back quickly”. Additionally, the recovery from the pandemic has to date exceeded expectations.

Second, in the context of what looks to be an interruption to growth from current lockdowns, it is not going to be meaningfully attenuated by delaying for a month or two a decision to taper bond purchases by $1 billion a week from September. Other approaches are more effective.

Third, the Governor noted, the “recent fiscal responses by the Australian Government and the state and territory governments are also providing welcome support to the economy at a time of significant short-term disruption.” Of course, one hopes that such measures are intelligently crafted and targeted. Regrettably that hasn’t always been the case.

Flexibility the key differentiator

Most important is the emphasis given by the RBA to its 'flexibility'. This flexibility is a key differentiator between the RBA and some other central banks who have appeared to foreshadow policy rate increases in 2022. Given the uncertainties ahead, the RBA has done well to avoid any such undertaking, even if it has been of a conditional nature in other jurisdictions.

In other words, if the situation deteriorates the RBA has already communicated that its process allows it to quickly flick the switch and increase bond purchases.

For this reason, it would be a mistake to see the August RBA Board meeting as an indication that the RBA was following the lead of other commodity-intensive economy central banks such as the Bank of Canada, the Norges Bank and RBNZ or even the Fed ‘dot plot’ in indicating a significant retreat from historically high levels of monetary accommodation, including policy rate increases in 2022.

The RBA’s expects that the condition (or ‘outcome’) for any increase in the policy rate “will not be met before 2024".

In this context, the RBA is best viewed as a ‘caged dove’ (a 'dove' is defined as a central banker who generally favours easy monetary policy).

That will likely persist, at least until the RBA gets some clarity on the US Federal Reserve’s (the Fed’s) approach. It is the Fed’s approach to inflation that looms large as a challenge for investors.

Certainly the Fed has commenced “talking about talking about” tapering, and strong economic data and clear inflation pressures are likely to escalate that chatter turning the Fed into a ‘reluctant hawk’ (and 'hawks' generally favour tighter monetary policy).

Investment portfolio diversification

It may be for investors that any escalation of tapering talk, particularly given clear and present inflation danger, necessitates a questioning of portfolio diversification practice, including the assumed negative return correlation between bonds and equities.

As the chart below shows, in the period beginning with the ‘tech wreck’ at the turn of this century, bond and equity returns have been negatively correlated. In essence, once inflation had been purged, any periods of stress in the outlook for economic growth and associated downdraft in equity markets could be quickly addressed by easier monetary policy (lower interest rates and lower bond yields).

However, with bond yields at historic lows, and policy rates approaching the ‘zero-bound’, it is reasonable to question whether yields can go meaningfully lower, particularly given inflation pressures, and what that might imply for the diversification properties of high credit quality nominal government bonds, particularly as long-dormant inflation pressures emerge.

If, in the wake of persistence in inflation, the Fed has to jam down hard on the monetary brakes, leading to sharp upward movements in bond yields, there may well be a significant correction in equity and bond markets.

Multi-asset investing implications

Such a scenario looms as a major challenge for investors, including how multi-asset investors react to a potential reversal of long-held assumptions regarding asset return correlation. That is equity returns and bond returns become positively correlated in the worst possible way  - in extremis, both deliver negative returns.

Clearly the search for differentiated portfolio exposures uncorrelated with conventional equity or bond returns looms as a particular challenge.

In the defensive space, inflation-linked bonds or absolute return or  ‘unconstrained’ bond funds are worth consideration. Gold may also be a candidate but its traditional role as an inflation hedge is undermined somewhat by rising bond yields increasing the opportunity cost of holding gold.

If the RBA lags the Fed, which seems likely, then the Australian dollar (AUD) is likely to come under some pressure which may ameliorate any negative performance of unhedged global exposures.

One thing is clear, even if the RBA remains a ‘caged dove’, emerging inflation may cast the Fed as a ‘reluctant hawk’, heralding a requirement for investors to think more imaginatively about portfolio diversification.

 

Stephen Miller is an Investment Strategist with GSFM, a sponsor of Firstlinks. He has previously worked in The Treasury and in the office of the then Treasurer, Paul Keating, from 1983-88. The views expressed are his own and do not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more papers and articles from GSFM and partners, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

A tale of the inflation genie, the Fed and the RBA

It's not all about interest rates: give me a 1980s petshop galah!

Ian Macfarlane on central bank policies, inflation and China

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.