Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 48

Economic growth and equity return outlook

The outlook for global economic growth for 2014 is improving, but is this a good thing for equity returns?

One of the great myths in financial markets, supported by neat textbook theories, is that economic growth somehow drives (or is accompanied by, or maybe is even caused by) corporate earnings growth, and that earnings growth drives stock prices (or at least that expectations of economic growth or expectations of earnings growth drive stock prices). Or perhaps even that expectations of economic growth drive stock prices directly.

None of these assumptions hold true very often in the real world. There is no statistical correlation between economic growth and stock market returns, either at a global level or in individual countries.

The global picture

Economies are highly interconnected and stock markets are also highly correlated.

Only rarely does above average world economic growth coincide with above average stock market returns. In only two of the past 34 years since 1980 has this been the case – 1988 and 2006. Also, in only six years has below average economic growth coincided with below average stock market returns – 1981, 1990, 1992, 2001, 2002 & 2008.

In fact at least half of the time when economic growth was above average, stock market returns were below average, and at least half of the time when economic growth was below average (including in recessions), stock market returns were above average.

The following chart shows yearly world real GDP growth and world stock market total returns since 1980:

2013

Last year was similar to several other counter-intuitive years in the recent past. When economic growth slowed and was below average (and earnings growth was very weak) stock market returns were above average. This followed 2012 when economic growth also slowed and was below average, and earnings growth was very poor, but stock market returns were a very healthy 16%.

2011 was also counter-intuitive. Economic growth was above average in 2011 (3.9% compared to a 30 year average of 3.7%) but stock market returns were negative globally.

Going back further, in 2010 global economic growth was above average but stock market returns were below average, and in 2009 world economic growth contracted in the deepest contraction since the 1930s depression but shares had a great year in 2009, with the world market index returning 29%.

Individual Countries

There is a similar story when looking at cross sectional returns in individual countries in any particular year. For example, in 2011 economies almost everywhere grew (except Japan with its tsunami/nuclear crisis), global economic growth was above its long term average, and earnings and dividends grew strongly, but almost all stock markets around the world were down heavily.

The highest growth economies (China, India and Turkey) had the worst stock market returns. Of the few stock markets that had positive total returns in 2011, only Indonesia posted price gains. In the others (US, Thailand, Pakistan and South Africa) the broad market price index fell, but the addition of dividends helped them scrape into positive total return territory, while Malaysia was flat.

This situation reversed in 2012 when most economies slowed and earnings growth stopped, but stock markets in almost every country boomed.

Nearly all stock markets were up in 2012 while economic growth was patchy. US growth was sub-trend, and Europe drifted in and out of recession, with significant contractions in the PIIGS, but equities boomed across these markets. The highest economic growth rate was in China, which had one of the worse stock market returns. The worst economy was Greece, which had one of the best performing stock markets.

2013 was a repeat of this counter-intuitive pattern.

Aside from the two outliers, Pakistan and Japan (for peculiar local reasons), every other major country fell into a band that stretches from top left to bottom right on the chart, with poor economic growth and good stock market returns (top left segment), or good economic growth and poor stock market returns (bottom right segment).

Once again China enjoyed the highest economic growth rate but suffered negative equity returns. Greece, Spain and Italy suffered the deepest economic contractions but enjoyed high equity returns.

If economic growth and stock market returns were positively related, the band would extend from bottom left to top right, but this is not how it works in most years in the real world.

2014?

Today there is a widespread assumption that the outlook for 2014 for improving global growth to a historical average of around 3.6% should be positive for equity returns.

We do not assume that improving economic growth rates will lead to, be caused by, or accompany, good equity returns, as most market economists and equity market strategists do. Instead we view the current consensus outlooks for improving economic growth to around average or trend (ie healthy, or ‘normal’) global growth in 2014 more as a possible warning sign of poor returns.

It pays to think independently and study real world outcomes instead of blindly following convention, market myths and textbook theories.

 

Ashley Owen is Joint Chief Executive Officer of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund.

 

  •   7 February 2014
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Danny Dreyfus
February 07, 2014

Really good article by Ashley, and a reminder of counter intuitive investing (or is that counter cyclical?), and "past performance is no indication of future performance" and so on.

Mitchell
February 08, 2014

Markets are an emotional beast. Carry a bag of psychology with you at all times!

David
February 09, 2014

I have always wondered why most equity fund managers include a general "economic update" in their portfolio performance reports? Is the short term economic situation relevant to the performance of their fund, or the market in general? The Philo research would seem to suggest it's not. Are economic updates from fund managers just more distracting "noise" for investors?

Ramzi
February 09, 2014

Is this not a case of stock markets looking ahead 12-18 months from the present. Never satisfied with company returns of the past six months theyre always challenging companies to repeat or improve historical returns. So that when companies are doing well, stock markets are predicting the eventual downturn and when companies are doing badly, markets are looking at the eventual improvement. its a continuous cycle...

Sergey
March 16, 2014

Maybe it is when stockbrokers and fund managers are busy at work (lot of orders to fulfill) they have no time to play with markets, and when they are free from work (when it is slow) they can now finally play with markets? One task at time, is the idea we are looking for here.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Global market growth hinges on Iran War and AI rollout

Is your fund manager skilful or just lucky?

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Planning

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Lithium's latest drop and what it means for ASX investors

Lithium's latest sell-off has punished ASX miners as prices remain hostage to shifting expectations. The key challenge is navigating a market prone to extreme volatility despite a strong case for the long-term demand outlook.

Investment strategies

CGT reform and fund turnover: who really feels the impact?

The implications of CGT reform are far and wide. As the 50% discount gives way to inflation indexation, turnover and return profiles may become critical drivers of after-tax performance. Some strategies face a far greater hit.

Superannuation

Super was built for a very different Australia

Our retirement system was built around assumptions that no longer hold. Lower homeownership, longer lifespans and changing expectations are exposing cracks that policymakers and super funds need to address.

Retirement

Retirement in reality - 4 months in

Many people spend years planning financially for retirement but little time preparing for what comes next. Four months in, here are the surprising lessons I've learnt on finding purpose, social connection and healthy habits.

Investment strategies

After the Budget, Australia needs its own definition of quality

As tax reforms reshape investment incentives, investors should rethink what quality investing means in the uniquely concentrated Australian market, where traditional frameworks may not translate as effectively.

Datacenters are the new shale oil

Why are tech giants pouring billions into datacentres when the economics look questionable? The most dangerous words in investing may be: "everyone else is doing it". Today's AI boom has striking parallels with the shale bust.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.