Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 48

Economic growth and equity return outlook

The outlook for global economic growth for 2014 is improving, but is this a good thing for equity returns?

One of the great myths in financial markets, supported by neat textbook theories, is that economic growth somehow drives (or is accompanied by, or maybe is even caused by) corporate earnings growth, and that earnings growth drives stock prices (or at least that expectations of economic growth or expectations of earnings growth drive stock prices). Or perhaps even that expectations of economic growth drive stock prices directly.

None of these assumptions hold true very often in the real world. There is no statistical correlation between economic growth and stock market returns, either at a global level or in individual countries.

The global picture

Economies are highly interconnected and stock markets are also highly correlated.

Only rarely does above average world economic growth coincide with above average stock market returns. In only two of the past 34 years since 1980 has this been the case – 1988 and 2006. Also, in only six years has below average economic growth coincided with below average stock market returns – 1981, 1990, 1992, 2001, 2002 & 2008.

In fact at least half of the time when economic growth was above average, stock market returns were below average, and at least half of the time when economic growth was below average (including in recessions), stock market returns were above average.

The following chart shows yearly world real GDP growth and world stock market total returns since 1980:

2013

Last year was similar to several other counter-intuitive years in the recent past. When economic growth slowed and was below average (and earnings growth was very weak) stock market returns were above average. This followed 2012 when economic growth also slowed and was below average, and earnings growth was very poor, but stock market returns were a very healthy 16%.

2011 was also counter-intuitive. Economic growth was above average in 2011 (3.9% compared to a 30 year average of 3.7%) but stock market returns were negative globally.

Going back further, in 2010 global economic growth was above average but stock market returns were below average, and in 2009 world economic growth contracted in the deepest contraction since the 1930s depression but shares had a great year in 2009, with the world market index returning 29%.

Individual Countries

There is a similar story when looking at cross sectional returns in individual countries in any particular year. For example, in 2011 economies almost everywhere grew (except Japan with its tsunami/nuclear crisis), global economic growth was above its long term average, and earnings and dividends grew strongly, but almost all stock markets around the world were down heavily.

The highest growth economies (China, India and Turkey) had the worst stock market returns. Of the few stock markets that had positive total returns in 2011, only Indonesia posted price gains. In the others (US, Thailand, Pakistan and South Africa) the broad market price index fell, but the addition of dividends helped them scrape into positive total return territory, while Malaysia was flat.

This situation reversed in 2012 when most economies slowed and earnings growth stopped, but stock markets in almost every country boomed.

Nearly all stock markets were up in 2012 while economic growth was patchy. US growth was sub-trend, and Europe drifted in and out of recession, with significant contractions in the PIIGS, but equities boomed across these markets. The highest economic growth rate was in China, which had one of the worse stock market returns. The worst economy was Greece, which had one of the best performing stock markets.

2013 was a repeat of this counter-intuitive pattern.

Aside from the two outliers, Pakistan and Japan (for peculiar local reasons), every other major country fell into a band that stretches from top left to bottom right on the chart, with poor economic growth and good stock market returns (top left segment), or good economic growth and poor stock market returns (bottom right segment).

Once again China enjoyed the highest economic growth rate but suffered negative equity returns. Greece, Spain and Italy suffered the deepest economic contractions but enjoyed high equity returns.

If economic growth and stock market returns were positively related, the band would extend from bottom left to top right, but this is not how it works in most years in the real world.

2014?

Today there is a widespread assumption that the outlook for 2014 for improving global growth to a historical average of around 3.6% should be positive for equity returns.

We do not assume that improving economic growth rates will lead to, be caused by, or accompany, good equity returns, as most market economists and equity market strategists do. Instead we view the current consensus outlooks for improving economic growth to around average or trend (ie healthy, or ‘normal’) global growth in 2014 more as a possible warning sign of poor returns.

It pays to think independently and study real world outcomes instead of blindly following convention, market myths and textbook theories.

 

Ashley Owen is Joint Chief Executive Officer of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund.

 

  •   7 February 2014
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Danny Dreyfus
February 07, 2014

Really good article by Ashley, and a reminder of counter intuitive investing (or is that counter cyclical?), and "past performance is no indication of future performance" and so on.

Mitchell
February 08, 2014

Markets are an emotional beast. Carry a bag of psychology with you at all times!

David
February 09, 2014

I have always wondered why most equity fund managers include a general "economic update" in their portfolio performance reports? Is the short term economic situation relevant to the performance of their fund, or the market in general? The Philo research would seem to suggest it's not. Are economic updates from fund managers just more distracting "noise" for investors?

Ramzi
February 09, 2014

Is this not a case of stock markets looking ahead 12-18 months from the present. Never satisfied with company returns of the past six months theyre always challenging companies to repeat or improve historical returns. So that when companies are doing well, stock markets are predicting the eventual downturn and when companies are doing badly, markets are looking at the eventual improvement. its a continuous cycle...

Sergey
March 16, 2014

Maybe it is when stockbrokers and fund managers are busy at work (lot of orders to fulfill) they have no time to play with markets, and when they are free from work (when it is slow) they can now finally play with markets? One task at time, is the idea we are looking for here.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is your fund manager skilful or just lucky?

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

A year like few others, but what's next?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The ultimate superannuation EOFY checklist 2026

Here is a checklist of 28 important issues you should address before June 30 to ensure your SMSF or other super fund is in order and that you are making the most of the strategies available.

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Lithium's rally is real this time – but no-one trusts it

The lithium rally mirrors the early-2010s tech stock surge, with demand set to double by 2030. Supply has been slow to respond, creating a market deficit for future tech like humanoid robotics and solid-state batteries.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

Two months into retirement

A retirement researcher's take on retirement and her focus on each of her six resource buckets to stay engaged during the transition and beyond.

Latest Updates

Are the government’s CGT changes better for young investors?

New CGT rules promise fairness, but could young investors lose out? A practical scenario reveals how changes impact deposit goals, investment choices, and long-term wealth building for the next generation.

Retirement

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Investment strategies

AI can’t pick winning funds, but it can help you avoid losers

Machine learning has been touted a game changer investment management. But a new study overturns claims that AI can generate positive alpha in mutual funds. Here are some practical takeaways for investors.

Investment strategies

Inflation BIG picture: Boomers got lucky, next Gen not so much

A 150-year view shows inflation's upward bias, driven by shifting monetary regimes and war stocks. This marks an end to the low-inflation boom that enriched boomers and ushers in a higher-inflation era for younger investors.

Planning

Tax deductibility of financial advice improves affordability

A shrinking adviser workforce and rising costs are squeezing access to financial advice, just as demand surges. Expanded tax deductibility offers a modest but meaningful boost to affordability.

Retirement

Retirement in reality – 3 months in

A reflection on travel mishaps, smart decision-making, time pressures and rebuilding health habits. Three months in, here's how to navigate the surprising realities of life after work.

Taxation

Calculating the business cost of Australia’s new 'productivity tax'

Amid a national productivity crisis, new economic analysis finds the tax changes in the 2026 Federal Budget create Australia’s first-ever by design 'Productivity Tax', where young people will pay the biggest price.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.