Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 405

It's not all about interest rates: give me a 1980s petshop galah!

The notion that the RBA ‘chooses to allow’ the ‘voluntary unemployment’ of several hundred thousand Australians is something that may come as a surprise to many. Yet that is precisely the charge levelled at the central bank in a tome from economist Ross Garnaut. He claims that such unemployment was a consequence of the RBA running monetary policy too tight after 2012.

Now Ross Garnaut is no slouch. He was a senior economic adviser to then PM Bob Hawke during the 1980s and has written extensively and thoughtfully on economic policy issues for decades.

However, the charge against the RBA is largely a specious one.

For one thing, the average monthly unemployment rate from February 1978 (when the current series was commenced) to the end of 2012 was 7.0%. From that point to the onset of the pandemic it was 5.6%.

It might be interesting to find out who Garnaut puts in the frame for the even greater levels of ‘voluntary unemployment’ in the decades prior to 2012.

It's not only about monetary policy

Of course, hindsight is a wonderful thing, and the RBA may have run monetary policy a little too firmly after 2012. It is also probably true that the time has come to move on from inflation targeting as the overarching focus for monetary policy. Perhaps to one that explicitly embraces, among other things, an employment objective.

In the scheme of things, the RBA’s ‘culpability’ for unemployment levels is not deserved of the prominence that Garnaut and others give it. That prominence derives from an unbridled but misplaced faith in the efficacy of macro policy and a corresponding reluctance to consider structural measures that enhance the economy’s flexibility and adaptability.

The political wherewithal to consider such measures reached their apogee under the banner of ‘microeconomic reform’ during Paul Keating’s Treasurership.

By the late 1980s, as the then Treasurer put it, “every galah in the petshop was talking about microeconomic reform”. That agenda extended through the 1990s during his Prime Ministership and into the early stages of the Howard Government. (To be fair to Garnaut, he does canvass, albeit selectively, some measures of this nature.)

Where are the microeconomic reforms?

It was those type of microeconomic reforms, including measures to enhance labour market flexibility, that drove the ‘natural’ rate of unemployment lower, to the ‘4 point something’ now articulated by RBA Governor Lowe as a potential ‘natural’ rate, or perhaps even as low as the 3.5% Garnaut now posits.

But the current tacit refusal of both sides of politics not only to assign such ‘microeconomic reform’ measures to the ‘too hard’ basket, but in some cases reverse those reforms, looms as a bigger potential culprit in occasioning higher unemployment than any ‘failure’ to adequately fine-tune macro or monetary policy.

For the most part, however, every galah in the petshop now persists in talking about nothing else other than how an (easier) twist in monetary policy, including a turn to the ‘unconventional’, is a pivotal part of a panacea for our perceived economic ills.

But monetary policy is limited in what it can achieve and should be just one increasingly minor part of the overall policy armoury. Key global central bankers, including Governor Lowe, have been trying to tell markets, governments and academia this very fact for some time – apparently to little avail.

Meanwhile, historically high levels of monetary accommodation have unleashed a plethora of ‘unintended consequences’, such as asset bubbles and growing wealth inequality, excessive risk-taking and attendant financial stability concerns. Easy liquidity sets ‘moral hazard’ traps that debilitate economic performance by allowing ‘zombie’ companies to persist, ultimately delaying necessary economic adjustment and lowering the economy’s growth path by inhibiting its productivity, flexibility and dynamism.

That is not to say there is no role for macro policy in a post-pandemic environment. But an assessment of that role should include a revisiting of the objectives of monetary policy and, more importantly, a recognition of its limitations.

We need to use all arms of economic policy

Central banks, including the RBA, are not perfect. The galahs in the pet shop – gratuitously - remind us of this all too often. But central banks need support from, and need to support, other arms of economic policy.

So, I do wish - just occasionally - that those aged petshop galahs would sometimes advance an advocacy of the agenda that they pushed in the 1980s. An agenda that ultimately set up Australia for a globally unprecedented three-decade long expansion and one that has the best chance of navigating the economy safely to and through the post-pandemic world.

 

Stephen Miller is an Investment Strategy Consultant with GSFM, a sponsor of Firstlinks. He has previously worked in The Treasury and in the offoce of the then Treasurer, Paul Keating, from 1983-88. The views expressed are his own and do not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Ian Macfarlane on central bank policies, inflation and China

Seven key charts on the global economy and investments

How to read RBA interest rate decisions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The risk-return tradeoff: What’s the right asset mix for a 5% return?

Conservative investors are forced to choose between protecting capital and accepting lower income while drawing down capital to maintain living standards or taking additional risk. How can you strike a balance?

How long will my retirement savings last?

Many self-funded retirees will outlive their savings as most men and women now aged 65 will survive at least another 20 years. Compare your spending with how much you earn to see how long your money will last.

Buffett's favourite indicator versus all-in equities

Peter Thornhill shows how his personal portfolio has thrived under an 'all-in equities' strategy, but Warren Buffett's favourite valuation indicator says stock markets are priced at their most extreme ever.

In fact, most people have no super when they die

Contrary to the popular belief supported by the 'fact base' of the Retirement Income Review, four in every five Australians aged 60 and over have no super in the period up to four years before their death.

Five timeless lessons from a life in investing

40 years of investing is distilled into five crucial lessons. An overall theme is to embrace uncertainty to make an impact on how much you earn, how much you spend, how much you save and how much risk you take.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 403

Most Australians hold their superannuation in a balanced fund, often 60% growth/40% defensive or 70%/30%. Lifecycle funds are also popular, where the amount in defensive assets increases with age. Employees who are not engaged with their super (and that's most people when they start full-time work) simply tick a box for the default fund selected on their behalf by their employer. Are these funds still appropriate?

  • 15 April 2021

Latest Updates

Property

Whoyagonnacall? 10 unspoken risks buying off-the-plan

All new apartment buildings have defects, and inexperienced owners assume someone else will fix them. But developers and builders will not volunteer to spend time and money unless someone fights them. Part 1

Superannuation

Super changes, the Budget and 2021 versus 2022

Josh Frydenberg's third budget contained changes to superannuation and other rules but their effective date is expected to be 1 July 2022. Take care not to confuse them with changes due on 1 July 2021.

Economy

Why don't higher prices translate into inflation? Blame hedonism

Why are prices rising but not the CPI? When we measure inflation, we aren’t measuring raw price changes, we’re measuring the pleasure-adjusted or utility-adjusted price changes, and we use it incorrectly.

Economy

Should investors brace for uncomfortably high inflation?

The global recession came quickly and deeply but it has given way to a strong rebound. What are the lessons for investors, how should a portfolio change and what role will inflation play?

Risk management

Revealed: Madoff so close to embezzling Australian investors

We are publishing this anonymously knowing it comes from an impeccable source. Bernie Madoff’s fund was almost distributed to retail Australian investors a year before the largest-ever hedge fund fraud was exposed.

Exchange traded products

How long can your LICs continue to pay dividends?

Some LICs have recently paid out more in dividends than their net profit as they have the ability to tap their retained profits and reserves. Others reduced dividends to ease the burden on cashflow and balance sheets.

SMSF strategies

How SMSF contribution reserving can use the higher caps

With the increase in the concessional cap to $27,500 on 1 July 2021, a contribution reserving strategy could allow a member to make and claim deductions for personal contributions of up to $52,500 this year.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.