Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 405

It's not all about interest rates: give me a 1980s petshop galah!

The notion that the RBA ‘chooses to allow’ the ‘voluntary unemployment’ of several hundred thousand Australians is something that may come as a surprise to many. Yet that is precisely the charge levelled at the central bank in a tome from economist Ross Garnaut. He claims that such unemployment was a consequence of the RBA running monetary policy too tight after 2012.

Now Ross Garnaut is no slouch. He was a senior economic adviser to then PM Bob Hawke during the 1980s and has written extensively and thoughtfully on economic policy issues for decades.

However, the charge against the RBA is largely a specious one.

For one thing, the average monthly unemployment rate from February 1978 (when the current series was commenced) to the end of 2012 was 7.0%. From that point to the onset of the pandemic it was 5.6%.

It might be interesting to find out who Garnaut puts in the frame for the even greater levels of ‘voluntary unemployment’ in the decades prior to 2012.

It's not only about monetary policy

Of course, hindsight is a wonderful thing, and the RBA may have run monetary policy a little too firmly after 2012. It is also probably true that the time has come to move on from inflation targeting as the overarching focus for monetary policy. Perhaps to one that explicitly embraces, among other things, an employment objective.

In the scheme of things, the RBA’s ‘culpability’ for unemployment levels is not deserved of the prominence that Garnaut and others give it. That prominence derives from an unbridled but misplaced faith in the efficacy of macro policy and a corresponding reluctance to consider structural measures that enhance the economy’s flexibility and adaptability.

The political wherewithal to consider such measures reached their apogee under the banner of ‘microeconomic reform’ during Paul Keating’s Treasurership.

By the late 1980s, as the then Treasurer put it, “every galah in the petshop was talking about microeconomic reform”. That agenda extended through the 1990s during his Prime Ministership and into the early stages of the Howard Government. (To be fair to Garnaut, he does canvass, albeit selectively, some measures of this nature.)

Where are the microeconomic reforms?

It was those type of microeconomic reforms, including measures to enhance labour market flexibility, that drove the ‘natural’ rate of unemployment lower, to the ‘4 point something’ now articulated by RBA Governor Lowe as a potential ‘natural’ rate, or perhaps even as low as the 3.5% Garnaut now posits.

But the current tacit refusal of both sides of politics not only to assign such ‘microeconomic reform’ measures to the ‘too hard’ basket, but in some cases reverse those reforms, looms as a bigger potential culprit in occasioning higher unemployment than any ‘failure’ to adequately fine-tune macro or monetary policy.

For the most part, however, every galah in the petshop now persists in talking about nothing else other than how an (easier) twist in monetary policy, including a turn to the ‘unconventional’, is a pivotal part of a panacea for our perceived economic ills.

But monetary policy is limited in what it can achieve and should be just one increasingly minor part of the overall policy armoury. Key global central bankers, including Governor Lowe, have been trying to tell markets, governments and academia this very fact for some time – apparently to little avail.

Meanwhile, historically high levels of monetary accommodation have unleashed a plethora of ‘unintended consequences’, such as asset bubbles and growing wealth inequality, excessive risk-taking and attendant financial stability concerns. Easy liquidity sets ‘moral hazard’ traps that debilitate economic performance by allowing ‘zombie’ companies to persist, ultimately delaying necessary economic adjustment and lowering the economy’s growth path by inhibiting its productivity, flexibility and dynamism.

That is not to say there is no role for macro policy in a post-pandemic environment. But an assessment of that role should include a revisiting of the objectives of monetary policy and, more importantly, a recognition of its limitations.

We need to use all arms of economic policy

Central banks, including the RBA, are not perfect. The galahs in the pet shop – gratuitously - remind us of this all too often. But central banks need support from, and need to support, other arms of economic policy.

So, I do wish - just occasionally - that those aged petshop galahs would sometimes advance an advocacy of the agenda that they pushed in the 1980s. An agenda that ultimately set up Australia for a globally unprecedented three-decade long expansion and one that has the best chance of navigating the economy safely to and through the post-pandemic world.

 

Stephen Miller is an Investment Strategy Consultant with GSFM, a sponsor of Firstlinks. He has previously worked in The Treasury and in the offoce of the then Treasurer, Paul Keating, from 1983-88. The views expressed are his own and do not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES

A tale of the inflation genie, the Fed and the RBA

Ian Macfarlane on central bank policies, inflation and China

Seven key charts on the global economy and investments

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Three steps to planning your spending in retirement

What happens when a superannuation expert sets up his own retirement portfolio using decades of knowledge? He finds he can afford much more investment risk in his portfolio than conventional thinking suggests.

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

There is a small universe of companies on the ASX which are reliable dividend payers over five years, are fairly valued and are classified as ‘negligible’ or ‘low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk.

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.

Among key trends in Australian banks, one factor stands out

The Big Four banks look similar but they are at fundamentally different stages as they move to simpler business models. Amid challenges from operating systems, loan growth and neobank threats, one factor stands tall.

Why mega-tech growth are the best ‘value’ stocks in the market

They are six of the greatest businesses ever and should form part of the global portfolios of all investors. The market sees risk in inflation and valuations but the companies are positioned for outstanding growth.

How to manage the run down in your income in retirement

The first of five articles on modern retirement income products that aim for an increasing pension that lasts for life and on average should not decline in real terms. They are not silver bullets but worth a look.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Retirement income promise relies on spending capital

The Government has taken the next step towards encouraging retirees to live off their capital, and from 1 July 2022 will require super funds - even SMSFs - to address retirement income and protect longevity risk.

Superannuation

How retirees might find a retirement solution in future

Superannuation funds need to establish a framework that offers retirees a retirement income solution that lasts a lifetime. It will challenge trustees to find a way to engage that their members understand and trust.

Investment strategies

Dividend investors, your turn is coming

Dividend payments from listed companies, depended on by many in retirement, have lagged the rebound in share prices over the past year. Better times are ahead but sources of dividends will differ from previous years.

Investment strategies

Four tips to catch the next 10-bagger in early-stage growth

Small cap investors face less mature companies with zero profit that need significant capital for growth. Without years of financial data to rely on, investors must employ creative ways to value companies.

Investment strategies

Investing in Japan: ready for an Olympic revival?

All eyes are on Japan and the opportunity to win for competing athletes. After disappointing investors for many years, Japan is also in focus for its value, diversification and the safe haven status of its currency.

Fixed interest

Five lessons for bond investors from the Virgin collapse

The collapse of Virgin Australia not only hit shareholders, but their bond investors received between 9 and 13 cents in the $1. A widely-diversified portfolio can tolerate losses better than a concentrated one.

Investment strategies

The 60:40 portfolio ... if no longer appropriate, then what is?

The traditional 60/40 portfolio might deliver only 1.5% above inflation in future without diversification benefits. Knowing an asset’s attributes rather than arbitrary definitions is better for investors.

Retirement

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Retirees want better returns but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Financial advice and protection strategies in portfolios can enhance investment outcomes.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.