Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 115

Rising bond rates should be good for shares

There is a widely held belief, supported by theory, that rising bond yields should be bad for share prices. But is this true in real life? Just about every stockbroker and security analyst in the world today uses valuation models driven by discount rates based on long term government bond yields. The implication is that, all else being equal, a rise in government bond yields (which drives discount rates) should result in a fall in asset values.

The problem of course is that all else is never equal. Rising bond yields are usually the result of rising expectations of future interest rates and/or rising expectations of future inflation. The factors that drive these expectations are often also driving expectations of increased economic activity which, to varying degrees, may be expected to flow through to higher company revenues, profits and dividends. As a result, the relationship between government bond yields and share prices is more complex than it first seems.

This article studies all 27 bond yield spikes in the US market since World War II and their impacts on share prices. A subsequent paper will look at the Australian market.

Figure 1: US 10 year Treasuries and S&P500 share price index since 1980

(Click on the figure to enlarge it and see the detail better).

Statistical relationship bonds and shares

Bond yield spikes on the whole have had no consistent impact on, or statistical relationship with, share prices in the US market, either in the rising inflation phase (1946-1981) or in the disinflation phase (post-1981). It is notable that:

  • Around half of the US bond yield spikes since 1946 were accompanied by rising nominal share prices during the yield spike. (57% during the 1946-1981 rising inflation phase, 62% during the post 1981 disinflation phase, and 59% overall)
  • Around half of the bond yield spikes since 1946 were accompanied by rising real share prices during the yield spike. (43% during the 1946-1981 rising inflation phase, 54% during the post 1981 disinflation phase, and 48% overall).

This is shown in the following pair of charts that plot changes in bond yields during bond yield spikes versus nominal share price moves during the yield spike (left chart), and versus real share price moves during the yield spike (right chart). They show no clear relationship between the magnitude of the yield spike and share price returns during the spike:

AO Figure2 260615

Level of nominal bond yields at start of rate rise

What does make a difference to share price returns during bond yield spikes is the level of nominal bond yields at the start of the yield spike:

  • all of the bond yield spikes that started when nominal bond yields were low were accompanied by high nominal and real returns from shares during the spike; and
  • all of the bond yield spikes that started when nominal bond yields were high were accompanied by low nominal and real returns from shares during the spike.

This pattern has been consistent in both the rising inflation phase and also in the disinflation phase.

The next pair of charts shows this moderately strong negative relationship between the nominal bond yield at the start of the yield spike versus nominal share price moves during the yield spike (left chart), and versus real share price moves during the yield spike (right chart):

AO Figure3 260615

Current yield spike: When the last bond yield spike started in July 2012, the nominal bond yield at the start was an extremely low 1.43%. In all prior yield spikes since 1946 that started with nominal yields at very low levels, share prices have risen strongly in both nominal and real terms during the bond yield spike. This is the case once again during the current yield spike, as we are still bullish on US equities. (Editor’s note: this paper was written in March 2015).

Potential for favourable share returns

There are some reasonable indications that share returns are likely to be favourable during the current bond yield spike. Specifically:

  • Rising bond yields that start when nominal bond yields are low (which was the case at the start of the last bond yield spike and also the case now) have consistently been accompanied by high nominal and real returns from shares during past bond yield spikes. This has been the case through all types of market conditions and inflationary environments during the post-World War II era.
  • Rising bond yields that start when the CPI inflation rate is low (which was the case at the start of the last bond yield spike, and is still true now) have consistently been accompanied by high nominal and real returns from shares during past bond yield spikes. This has also been the case through all types of market conditions and inflationary environments during the post-World War II era.

At least we can say that historical precedents provide no warnings of poor returns, as poor returns have occurred when nominal bond yields and/or CPI inflation rates are high during the yield spikes, and neither is the case at present.

We wrote an original paper on this subject warning of the last yield spike in 2012, and the S&P500 index of US stocks indeed rose by 40% between when yields bottomed at the start of that spike to the last day in December 2013 (bond yields rose by 1.61% to 3.04%).

This is consistent with the patterns over the past seven decades through a wide variety of inflationary conditions, and this provides support for our relative bullish stance on US shares over the period, in the face of rising bond yields.

 

Ashley Owen is Joint CEO of Philo Capital Advisers and a director and adviser to the Third Link Growth Fund. This article is for general educational purposes only. It is not personal financial advice and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Are debt and its servicing cost serious worries?

Why are Aussie bond yields at lowest ever?

Briefly, on the role of government bonds

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates

Strategy

$1 billion and counting: how consultants maximise fees

Despite cutbacks in public service staff, we are spending over a billion dollars a year with five consulting firms. There is little public scrutiny on the value for money. How do consultants decide what to charge?

Investment strategies

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Financial planning

Reducing the $5,300 upfront cost of financial advice

Many financial advisers have left the industry because it costs more to produce advice than is charged as an up-front fee. Advisers are valued by those who use them while the unadvised don’t see the need to pay.

Strategy

Many people misunderstand what life expectancy means

Life expectancy numbers are often interpreted as the likely maximum age of a person but that is incorrect. Here are three reasons why the odds are in favor of people outliving life expectancy estimates.

Investment strategies

Slowing global trade not the threat investors fear

Investors ask whether global supply chains were stretched too far and too complex, and following COVID, is globalisation dead? New research suggests the impact on investment returns will not be as great as feared.

Investment strategies

Wealth doesn’t equal wisdom for 'sophisticated' investors

'Sophisticated' investors can be offered securities without the usual disclosure requirements given to everyday investors, but far more people now qualify than was ever intended. Many are far from sophisticated.

Investment strategies

Is the golden era for active fund managers ending?

Most active fund managers are the beneficiaries of a confluence of favourable events. As future strong returns look challenging, passive is rising and new investors do their own thing, a golden age may be closing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.